- Messages
- 73,987
That's Trump's quote. You can take what he says as fact, most don't.Thanks for the quote. Says it all right there.
That's Trump's quote. You can take what he says as fact, most don't.Thanks for the quote. Says it all right there.
"We" haven't discussed anything of the sort. It was you being busy trying to discredit the whole shebang because your fanboi didn't get one.No, as we've already discussed, they give it to the guy who dropped more bombs than Baby Bush.
No but it's in line with Trump's favorable-business-environment global policy approach. And killing people didn't stop Obama from winning.Do they award Nobel Peace prizes to leaders of countries for not invading and killing 100s thousands ?
No but it's in line with Trump's favorable-business-environment global policy approach. And killing people didn't stop Obama from winning.
If he won it then I wouldn't be able to continue to deride the award as political.
I like Trump because he is challenging an establishment that desperately needs it. Not because I think he is a quality person deserving of awards or accolades.
Exciting times!!!The establishment isn't perfect but it is better than anything Trump has to offer. He said he was going to drain the swamp but he forgot to tell everyone that he was going to fill it back up with faeces.
The establishment isn't perfect but it is better than anything Trump has to offer.
Well, that's one we're going to have to wait and see about
They are in a race to the bottom and are f**ked no matter who gets in. Far too much division and partisan politics. A big lesson for other nations on how not to trash your collective brand on the world stage.Well, that's one we're going to have to wait and see about. Joe Biden might have something to say about that. And if he does, will he be the last?
They are in a race to the bottom and are f**ked no matter who gets in. Far too much division and partisan politics. A big lesson for other nations on how not to trash your collective brand on the world stage.
Would anyone else have overseen fewer dead and better economic performance? If you're not making that claim then your point is meaningless. If you are making that claim show your working.220,000 people dead while the economy went backwards anyway
haven't you seen enough ?