herbert henry1908
Referee
- Messages
- 21,867
Just on the whole concept of compensation for clubs that have developed juniors, here’s an idea I like
If someone signs another clubs junior, before the age of 23 let’s say. The club signing has to pay a 25% fee of the salary to the original club, plus that fee goes against the new clubs salary cap.
Alternatively the fee could be waived if a player trade could be agreed upon.
This does two things. Firstly the original club gets some monetary compensation for the time and effort it took to develop the player, but the 25% also acts as a disincentive against offering silly amounts of money for other clubs juniors. If it was just 25% but it didn’t count towards the cap, this wouldn’t be enough of a disincentive.
So let’s say Burton signed with the Dogs for 600k. We get 150k per year, and Burton counts for 750k against the Dogs cap.
Of course this could run into legal trouble as a restraint of trade, but you can’t really know that until someone tests it in court.
If someone signs another clubs junior, before the age of 23 let’s say. The club signing has to pay a 25% fee of the salary to the original club, plus that fee goes against the new clubs salary cap.
Alternatively the fee could be waived if a player trade could be agreed upon.
This does two things. Firstly the original club gets some monetary compensation for the time and effort it took to develop the player, but the 25% also acts as a disincentive against offering silly amounts of money for other clubs juniors. If it was just 25% but it didn’t count towards the cap, this wouldn’t be enough of a disincentive.
So let’s say Burton signed with the Dogs for 600k. We get 150k per year, and Burton counts for 750k against the Dogs cap.
Of course this could run into legal trouble as a restraint of trade, but you can’t really know that until someone tests it in court.