View attachment 44529
It’s population is not bigger and the fact is as far as regional centres go the Sunshine Coast is bigger than the central coast and Wollongong and certainly bigger than Townsville and growing at a faster rate.
We are not ready for an NRL team ( yet ) but we are certainly moving towards regular games and other sports playing out of the new stadium and if QLD gets the Olympics than I wouldn’t be surprised if stage two gets completed of the stadium.
Fair enough, I'm not doing very well in this discussion lol.
Im a big advocate for reigning in club spending to get an overall expenditure level at an amount that can be met comfortably by realistic revenue generation for the majority of clubs. What that would do would be to make it far more achievable to spread the game to smaller population areas (who also struggle more to attract sponsors as well as fanbase).
I guess it depends on your vision for the top level. Should we have more clubs spending less or just have fewer clubs who can spend more? Would say a 22 conference based top level with clubs operating on a $25mill total expenditure budget lead to more people watching the game live and on tv and kids being more exposed to top level and getting into the game, or would it just be more small clubs struggling to get 12k to games and unable to make ends meet? Maybe getting 12k to games is ok and we have smaller 20k stadiums accordingly if revenue doesn't need to be so big? Should we punish successful wealthy clubs so smaller clubs can keep up?
Nq do seem an anomaly given their population size but seem a pretty sustainable club, I guess their LC must be popular.