3-2-1 v Bulldogs

[Meth]

3- Curran
2- Fonua-Blake
1- Aitken (very close to 2 points)

HM- Tevaga

O'Sullivan and Kosi had relatively good games, but with a few 'rocks'

Nobody was bad.

 

[Benek]

Kosi dropped more than a few rocks

 

[Benek]

SOS threw at least 3 rocks.

 

[Warriors Fever]

I reckon we put Townsend in next week instead of o Sullivan we should have had way more than 4 tries against that team

 

[Meth]

JTB pretty anonymous, as per usual.

 

[Scott]

I reckon we put Townsend in next week instead of o Sullivan we should have had way more than 4 tries against that team

We have won 3 in a row with Sean at 7. Why would be change it. Chad is in no way better.

 

[Benek]

3- Curran
2- Fonua-Blake
1- Aitken

Same top 3 for me

EDIT - after more thought I’m changing my vote. The bulldogs contained Walsh well but he did have a great try assist and excellent try of his own.

3 Curran
2 AFB
1 Walsh

 

[nswarrior]

3- Curran
2- Fonua-Blake
1- Walsh

 

[hitro]

3 Curran
2 AFB
1 Walsh

also liked having Egan back and like CHT back
this current line up have a good personality

 

[CheG]

3.Curren
2.Fonua Blake
1.whole team
But seriously
1.Jazz

 

[waipiro]

3- Curran
2- Fonua-Blake
1- Aitken (very close to 2 points)

HM- Tevaga

O'Sullivan and Kosi had relatively good games, but with a few 'rocks'

Nobody was bad.

Pompey was bad.....3 set restarts incl one with 1 minute to go in the first half defending on our 20m on the 5th tackle!

3 Curren
2 AFB
1 CHT

 

[JJ]

Man the Dogs are shit lol

3. Curran
2. AFB
1. Walsh

quite a few goood performances, but in the context of the Dogs being a terrible team

 

[Meth]

Pompey was bad.....3 set restarts incl one with 1 minute to go in the first half defending on our 20m on the 5th tackle!

3 Curren
2 AFB
1 CHT

yeah, although I wasn’t impressed with those set restarts. Felt like Gough was doing his best to get the Dogs in the game in the first half

 

[TheDMC]

3. AFB
2. Curran
1. Walsh

Our backs look completely disjointed on attack. Should have put 40 on the dogs, but a win is a win.

 

[sup42]

3 Curran
2 Montoya
1 AFB.

Good all round performance.

Kosi looked much sharper, some hard runs. made the expected mistakes but he has real potential.

 

[Grizzman]

I loved the 2 pts, I really like where we seem to be heading but man oh man, I would love to see a complete performance. We were rocks and diamonds but I guess the important thing is that we did enough to get the W.

3 - Curran. Did it all and got me 95 pts on Fantasy. He has become a revelation.
2 - AFB. He was all four props.
1 - Jazz. It was going to Kosi but for the late game errors. Jazz was good.

HM. Aitken, Kosi. Montoya.

DHM Pompey. He adds so little and was caused 2 set restarts.

I also thought we were really missing a game manager especially around the 5th tackle options.

 

[SpaceMonkey]

3- Curran
2- AFB
1- Aitken

Solid team performance, no real stinkers. It’s good to see guys like Kosi and SOS improving.

 

[waipiro]

yeah, although I wasn’t impressed with those set restarts. Felt like Gough was doing his best to get the Dogs in the game in the first half

yeah agreed ...he gave the dogs a lot longer on us in the tackle

 

[waipiro]

3. AFB
2. Curran
1. Walsh

Our backs look completely disjointed on attack. Should have put 40 on the dogs, but a win is a win.

I thought CHT was alright. I think the wingers lacked opportunity because both centres didnt go great. SOS look good in stages going deep into the line but couple of very average passes incl the intercept. Dogs were right up on Walsh as they said they would in pre match interview....but he still got a try assist

 

[waipiro]

Really like how Walsh goes for distance on his penalty touch finders. Know we had a tailwind 2nd half but even into the wind he had a crack.....seems logical to do it but we havent done it well going all the way back to Joel Moon who use to give it a good nudge!