If the Tigers winning a comp from 4th in '05 was a bradbury's will parra's inevitable premiership in '09 from 8th count as the same or even more so?
Not quite as the Eels and Dragons in 05 were deadset certainties. The finals were wide open this year with 7 teams (sorry Newcastle) having a realistic chance and no side being really dominant come September.
Not quite as the Eels and Dragons in 05 were deadset certainties. The finals were wide open this year with 7 teams (sorry Newcastle) having a realistic chance and no side being really dominant come September.
TOTAL CRAP. Saints and the dogs won more games this year than parra and saints did in 05.
AND the Tigers finsihed 2 losses short of parra and saints that year, Parra finished 5 losses short this year.
Its funny that bradbury isnt being thrown around this year.
I dont think you CAN fluke a premiership. Just wanna see if those who think the tigers did, still think the same.
Why would anyone think the same?
And who cares if they think the Tigers premiership was a Bradbury? They are idiots!
Yes its true. Parra fans are idiots.
agreed. melbourne seem to have cruised through the majority of this year.If Melbourne win it, then it could be classed as a bradbury imo, they have had a really comfortable ride. If parra win, its nothing short of one of the greatest efforts and form reversals of all time, nothing to do with luck.
:lol:He got them all good.Melon was the first person i know, from any forum to call it a "Bradbury"
:lol: great work mate, you stung em bad :lol:
Bam.If the Eels win the premiership then dont make the finals for the next 4 seasons then it could be a bradbury.