What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. W

    WA BEARS

    This was my point about the stint when the Sydney Bulldogs and Sydney Tigers played out of Parramatta. If a private group of investors not associated with or endorsed by The North Sydney Bears were the ones brokering the partnership with the WA consortium to have a team called the Bears then...
  2. W

    WA BEARS

    It's hard to move players when they're all long retired since "99. The time gap makes it seem a lot more new than it is, but it's the same club revived in a new city with a name change to reflect it.
  3. W

    WA BEARS

    The club has stated as much.
  4. W

    WA BEARS

    Bears obviously negotiated on every one of their non-negotiables. Perth didn't have an alternate mascot option ready to go either. Cummins said they were agnostic towards how the identity would take shape. 100%? Only seen articles stating a majority.
  5. W

    WA BEARS

    sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me 😌
  6. W

    WA BEARS

    They do. 1874 right in the middle of the Swans logo.
  7. W

    WA BEARS

    Were Balmain and Canterbury new teams when they called themselves Sydney and played out of Parra in "95?
  8. W

    WA BEARS

    How does a relocation turn into a takeover?
  9. W

    WA BEARS

    Would they not? This isn't forming a new merged Wests Tigers or St George Illawarra. This is one club linking up with a consortium and relocating for first-grade readmission.
  10. W

    WA BEARS

    They'll be keeping 1908 as the founding year.
  11. W

    WA BEARS

    1908 meaning nothing means exactly that. No reason to feel any way about it because it's not anything to be offended by.

Latest posts

Top