What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. E

    Will Des's $10000 fine cover the cost of the two touchies visit to OPSM?

    A stupid call by a ref doesn't make it the rule, it makes the ref stupid. Incidentally the very problem that this thread was started over.
  2. E

    The refs

    What a ridiculous thing to say... if that try wasn't scored, Manly would have still been up 20-12 and had the ball with about 6 mins to go. Even if it didn't give the eels the lead it put them in a position to win the game that they had no business being in. And of course, from a simple...
  3. E

    The refs

    Both sides were laying all over the play the ball in both halves. If the refs would just stay out of it it wouldn't be an issue.
  4. E

    The refs

    I counted at least 3 instances of Parra doing the exact same things Manly were being penalised for when the score was 20 - 12. I'm not saying Manly didn't deserve to be penalised, but if they didn't get anything back.
  5. E

    The refs

    Both sides were niggling, only the side in the lead was getting penalised for it
  6. E

    The refs

    I haven't seen the replay but apparently the touch judge was on the halfway line for that last pass for the winning try. Disgraceful. I also hate that the refs are ARTIFICIALLY creating these close comeback games by penalising the side that is in front out of the game. It has happened both...
  7. E

    '10 | R1 | Mon | Tigers 26-22 Sea Eagles | SFS

    Even if it's not a clean strip?
  8. E

    '10 | R1 | Mon | Tigers 26-22 Sea Eagles | SFS

    Am I the only one who is mystified as to how the tigers got the feed at the end when Seu Seu went for the strip, dislodged the ball and it travelled forward off tiger's hands? What is the rule?
  9. E

    '10 | R1 | Mon | Tigers 26-22 Sea Eagles | SFS

    I know that this has already been said but I can't believe people on these forums have been bagging Orford ever since his Melbourne days and how Manly were no chance of a premiership with him... (wrong by the way :D) And NOW that he's gone and there's a great rising talent (with a far better...
  10. E

    R1 v Wests Tigers @ SFS - Discussion Thread

    Well I don't think we lose much with Farrar replacing Wolfman (unless Farrar is being rushed back when he's less than 100%) but I'm just curious to see if it's true. It keeps getting taken down when posted on the MWSE forums so I'm thinking it could well be,
  11. E

    R1 v Wests Tigers @ SFS - Discussion Thread

    Is there any substance to the rumour that Wolfman is out due to an injury he sustained at training and Farrar will take his place tonight?
View older results

Latest posts

Top