What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

$1.5 million a year too much for Pirtek

Tony Bongo

Bench
Messages
3,006
Asking price too much for long-time Eels sponsor
Date
February 19, 2013


Michael Chammas
Rugby league reporter

End of an era ... the Eels will announce that Pirtek won't be extending their contract beyond the end of this season by the end of the week. Photo: Wolter Peeters
The Parramatta Eels will part ways with major sponsor Pirtek at the end of the season after failing to reach an agreement over the value of the deal.

The Herald understands the Eels have raised their asking price from $1 million to $1.5 million a season, an increase Pirtek didn't deem as a worthwhile investment.

It ends Pirtek's nine-year association as major sponsor, the second longest in the Eels' history behind James Hardie (15 years from 1981-1995).

Pirtek were keen to extend their contract with the western Sydney club for an amount similar to the $1 million-a-season they paid in 2010 as part of a three-year deal that extended through to the end of 2013.

But eyebrows were raised after the club asked for a 50 per cent increase for the front-of-jersey rights, despite finishing 12th, 14th and 16th on the ladder in the years that followed the club's renewed commitment after the 2009 grand final.

The Eels will announce that Pirtek won't be extending their contract beyond the end of this season by the end of the week.

There is a suggestion the Eels demanded such a large sponsorship price as a means to terminate their association with Pirtek because of the tension between the Eels board and Pirtek chief executive, Glenn Duncan.

Duncan resigned from the board in October 2011 after expressing his dismay over the way it handled the financial saga that surrounded former Eels boss Paul Osborne.

The Herald understands new Eels chief executive Ken Edwards tried to resolve the angst between Duncan and the board, but to no avail.

It remains unclear who will take over from Pirtek as the club's major sponsor from next season.

It is understood the Eels are looking at large billion-dollar organisations to affiliate themselves with from next year.

Whether they get the $1.5 million-a-season they asked from Pirtek will depend on the on-field success of the football club.

The Brisbane Broncos, who have the added advantage of playing the majority of their matches on free-to-air television in the prime time Friday night time slot, have a deal with NRMA Insurance believed to be worth $1.2 million a year.

While the NRL's decision to schedule the first 20 rounds will provide the Eels the luxury of some free-to-air matches, regardless of where they finish on the ladder this year, they will need to strike one of the biggest club sponsorship deals in the history of the game to attain their desired figure.

Penrith signed a deal with OAK that was reportedly worth a million dollars a season.

Pirtek are committed to seeing out the final year of their contract with the Eels

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...els-sponsor-20130218-2enk9.html#ixzz2LFB8yrJA
 

Tony Bongo

Bench
Messages
3,006
I assume they have someone else lined up that is willing to pay $1.5 million for a team that won the spoon last year.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
96,118
I heard it's some foreign bank.

london_sperm_bank_logo.png
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
79,165
finally all those sponsors 3P lined up years ago can come on board .... we'll be muthaf**kin rollin in it!
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
Couldn't have hurt to keep them as a bidder just in case any other potential deals fall through. I'd hate to see us still searching for a major sponsor in December though theres a lesson to be learned at least making sure your major sponsors CEO never sits on the club board.
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
Piss off Duncan, the original Kearney-lover.

Is it a coincidence that the man who appears to have pushed for Kearney to be signed as coach of our club (having sponsored the NZ team that Kearney coached) might have been hoping for a decrease (in real terms) of the cost of Eels sponsorship and exposure for his company, given the poor results we received during the Kearney era (plus that one year of white-anting Anderson)?

Talk about conflict of interest while he served on the Board... good riddance, and bring on the Bank (if a certain individual still even works there?).
 
Messages
19,724
If I were to rank the problems that we have had / still do suffer, Duncan wouldn't be anywhere near the top of the tree. He was the only one who thought that it was a touch weird that the former CEO owed money to the Chair (no matter how well-intentioned that loan might have been).

I think it would be a touch naive to expect that we (or other clubs) will not have sponsors' nominees play a role in the running of the clubs. But agree, that we have to be careful about how that happens.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top