Perth Red
Post Whore
- Messages
- 69,614
You pick your metric to measure success and I’ll pick Mine. Between having more tv viewers or $340million a year more cash to invest in ten game, I know which I’m picking!Shifting the goal posts again
You pick your metric to measure success and I’ll pick Mine. Between having more tv viewers or $340million a year more cash to invest in ten game, I know which I’m picking!Shifting the goal posts again
It’d be good for players that are never going to be good enough for nrl Or are too old for nrl, to still be able to earn some money in a semi pro league. It’s Just a Shame the countries so bloody big and that makes it so expensive!That's what should be happening, but I doubt it ever will.
The sport's too top heavy and there's no way that the NRL can sustain all the markets it needs to without rationalisation or significant changes to the structure of the competition. I also doubt that the comp or culture of the sport will be ready for such significant structural changes, like e.g. conferences or P&R, anytime soon, or will ever accept genuine attempts to rationalise the NRL again.
Desperate to try and make afl look good lolYou pick your metric to measure success and I’ll pick Mine. Between having more tv viewers or $340million a year more cash to invest in ten game, I know which I’m picking!
Union is dying in Brisbane. If it wasn't played at GPS and independent schools then it wouldn't be played at all.Not sure about Sydney but I don't know if this is true in Brisbane anymore.
I went to a top GPS school and the majority of my social circle went to GPS schools as well. We all played Union and barely anyone I know even watches Union anymore, they are all NRL fans now.
Perth has to be the frontrunners out of those three.Abdo has said that by 2027 we'll have 18 mens and 18 womens NRL teams. So we'll be expanding to somewhere... and it probably won't be SEQ again so soon after the Dolphins so we are left with Perth, PNG or NZ2 all will be new markets for the NRL.
Under what bid? Jets....fmd pleasePerth has to be the frontrunners out of those three.
The players they will discard, could easily go to that team 18Looks like the Bulldogs are buying enough players to be club 18, so they’ll have two teams in the NRL lol.
I think Perth is the common sense front runner. PNG is far too risky on so many levels.Under what bid? Jets....fmd please
Png are front runners, they offer increase in the player pool, and a NZ2 doesn't exist so as far as player talent NZ2 would be the best, perth aren't even at reserve grade level, especially if we are talking about the talent from their affiliate/pirates teams
Realistically Brisbane Tigers or Norths Bears are the far ahead as far as potential clubs, they are just not in "expansion areas" that we think are not represented... as Brisbane and Sydney are already represented enough... well Brisbane could do with more, but we all agree its too soon after the dolphins admission
Personally we could have 3 NZ and 3 SEQ teams added
Precisely. Having more viewers than your competitor is something - but if you can't transform that into higher revenue than your competitor brings-in, then WHY NOT?You pick your metric to measure success and I’ll pick Mine. Between having more tv viewers or $340million a year more cash to invest in ten game, I know which I’m picking!
If the afl and nrl were stocks the nrl would be a strong buy and afl a strong sellPrecisely. Having more viewers than your competitor is something - but if you can't transform that into higher revenue than your competitor brings-in, then WHY NOT?
Can’t see it a) because dolphins are far too early to add another competitor to. Let’s not forget titans started like a house on fire as well. B) news ltd won’t allow it. C) it’d be pretty embarrassing for the game if the nrls idea of expansion is to put two clubs in a heartland region that already had two clubsBrisbane 3 are frontrunners
Can’t see it a) because dolphins are far too early to add another competitor to. Let’s not forget titans started like a house on fire as well. B) news ltd won’t allow it. C) it’d be pretty embarrassing for the game if the nrls idea of expansion is to put two clubs in a heartland region that already had two clubs
however it is Vlandys and we know he has no faith or vision for growing beyond two states so you never know.
I can see nz2 for 19 and brisbane3 for 20 to enter 2030-35.
Precisely. Having more viewers than your competitor is something - but if you can't transform that into higher revenue than your competitor brings-in, then WHY NOT?
They also own the broncos. There’s a reason they demanded Redcliffe for club17.News own foxtel too!!
Brisbane is only bid with stable & known backers. Tigers been around almost as long as NRL. Reds died when owners lost interest.
They also own the broncos. There’s a reason they demanded Redcliffe for club17.
There are no bids, only interested bidders at this time. as you don’t know what the WA bid, or bids, may look like you’re guessing.
It's really hard to see Brisbane 3 being the next team, precisely because all the opposition it'd have from the Broncos, News Ltd, Dolphins & Titans.Can’t see it a) because dolphins are far too early to add another competitor to. Let’s not forget titans started like a house on fire as well. B) news ltd won’t allow it. C) it’d be pretty embarrassing for the game if the nrls idea of expansion is to put two clubs in a heartland region that already had two clubs
however it is Vlandys and we know he has no faith or vision for growing beyond two states so you never know.
I can see nz2 for 19 and brisbane3 for 20 to enter 2030-35.