What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

1st Test: Australia v Sri Lanka at Hobart Dec 14-18, 2012

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,350
im just following the scores online, is the pitch really playing up that much? we need 400 imo and that seems a long, long way off atm!

350 is plenty, I have always said you have to give SL incentive to go for the victory. It is harder to get wickets when the batsmen are in full survival mode...think Adelaide. We need SL to play shots in the 4th innings. 350-370 is a good medium between the two. If we can't bowl them out for under 370 we don't deserve to win.
 

Sphagnum

Coach
Messages
13,129
Nice job being the anchor there from our 'third best batsmen'

I'd say he is just inside the top 6 in this team and only barely.

Crap innings from a selfish player.
 

some11

Referee
Messages
23,694
f**k our top order has been brittle all summer, god help us if we actually are under pressure and chasing a modest total in the next 12 months.

I'm fully counting on them getting my hopes up only to collapse under pressure like you said.
 

Horrie Is God

First Grade
Messages
8,073
Historically Australia have produced batsmen who played for the team & not personal stats..

Guys who you would want standing next to you during a war..

Guys like AB,Tugger & Kat..

Now days we get androtops like Watto & Hughes..
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,350
The pitch is getting more and more uneven. This is a calm accumlators pitch. Not a hitting out pitch. I wish we were going about this differently.

The order at lunch should have been get runs but do it calmly, we have time, we'll declare an hour before stumps.

Instead we're rushing unnecessarily and it is costing us.

With 1 bowler down you want to declare leaving us only 100 overs....it took us 110 in the 1st dig FFS! The pitch is similar. You need 125 overs to bowl them out.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
With 1 bowler down you want to declare leaving us only 100 overs....it took us 110 in the 1st dig FFS! The pitch is similar. You need 125 overs to bowl them out.
We were 5/450 in the 1st innings. Now we're 4/180. The pitch is significantly harder to bat on than it was. There is movement. There is uneven bounce.

I'm not worried about time. I think one way or another there will be a result. But we need a proper total to defend without a key bowler. Closer to 400 than 300.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,350
We were 5/450 in the 1st innings. Now we're 4/180. The pitch is significantly harder to bat on than it was. There is movement. There is uneven bounce.

I'm not worried about time. I think one way or another there will be a result. But we need a proper total to defend without a key bowler. Closer to 400 than 300.

We are 280 ahead or whatever it is now...we only need another 70-90 runs maximum, get them as quick as possible, give yourself a day and a session to bowl them out.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Phil Hughes and his innings has forced the rest of the team to have to resort to going the Tonk

What a selfish merkin
 

BDR

First Grade
Messages
7,526
We already have enough to win you lot are overthinking this. Don't want to expose whe bowlers so we will declare at the fall of the next wicket.
 

Latest posts

Top