What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016 R19 - Roosters 20-32 Sharks @ Allianz Stadium

Round 19: Roosters v Sharks


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .

coolumsharkie

Referee
Messages
27,115
Poor decision on the no try. Roosters unlucky not to win imo, those 5th tackle options and rush plays ultimately was the difference.
 

GongPanther

Referee
Messages
28,676
Poor decision on the no try. Roosters unlucky not to win imo, those 5th tackle options and rush plays ultimately was the difference.

That no try call was the correct one IMO.He didn't ground the ball.The ball came out of his grip whilst still touching his arm,with his hand away from the ball in the same motion,signifying that it was lost.
 

CliffyIsGod

First Grade
Messages
6,454
That no try call was the correct one IMO.He didn't ground the ball.The ball came out of his grip whilst still touching his arm,with his hand away from the ball in the same motion,signifying that it was lost.
Exactly. Ref was in no position to call it. If Sutton/Klein had of said not try on field, no one would be talking about it.
 
Messages
126
Sharks looked a bit tired and a bit complacent. Not really a surprise with 4 coming off Origin.

Roosters played good but certainly weren't robbed. The no try with the obstruction was clear and what Graham did afterwards was irrelevant. As soon as he was obstructed the play was effectively finished.

Tupou grounding was a clear drop. Freeze frame showed it rolling out of his hand before contact.

Glad these refs haven't been listening to all Robinson's sooking every week - if that's the sort of shit he's been whingeing about, then it just feeds into the Roosters' blame deflecting, victim mentality.
 

Eion

First Grade
Messages
8,034
Lol roosters were hard done by. How many penalties dos they get I. The 2nd half? 6 to 1? And the 1 to the Sharks was the obstruction. Enjoy the spoon f**ktards.
 

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
Lol roosters were hard done by. How many penalties dos they get I. The 2nd half? 6 to 1? And the 1 to the Sharks was the obstruction. Enjoy the spoon f**ktards.

The on field referees have been unusually kind to the Roosters all season (tonight's count was 9 v 4 to the Roosters) but the video referees have found against us (or in favour of the opposition) on around 75% of occasions (so consistency was kept tonight)

Even when the on field ref finds in favour of the Roosters the bunker overturns it. It's happened time after time after time and has all season.

It's not even a surprise when it happens.
 

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
Topous no try was lucky not to be a penalty for a Shepard in the lead up by him.

Carch - before one of your tries, the Sharks knocked on down their own end of the field yet the refs decided to allow play on. Still it was a predictable result and your Sharkies avoided a banana skin there

Good luck for the rest of the season mate - we're on the Sharkies bandwagon
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
We've had 50 years in a row of shit ref calls.
The 2nd half was all roosters in terms of penalties.
That one on Ennis in the last couple of minutes was a beauty.
He pulls off a tough one on one and is on his head under the bloke and gets done.
He gets half the time other players do to get of a player he tackles.
Then dumb arse fergo dropped cold and Feki scores.
 

MilkShark

First Grade
Messages
5,162
Roosters robbed? You're kidding right?

You got a few penalties ''just because'' in that game and you didn't capitalise on it.
 

Latest posts

Top