Frank Burge
Juniors
- Messages
- 216
I think we will get another 5-6 1m+ games by end of rd 25 with all the top teams playing each other , also Broncos having a good season helps.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I think we will get another 5-6 1m+ games by end of rd 25 with all the top teams playing each other , also Broncos having a good season helps.
Whilst everyone in this thread wants to ignore it the total viewing hours is important. I realise it goes against the narrative that the NRL destroys the AFL but you can’t just ignore it.
When you're talking about ratings ... the NRL does destroy the aflol
Adjust total viewing hours with how many are watching
Yes I was thinking about the same thing myself. I suppose another way to look at it though is that on average ~ 560 000 ( 8 x`s 70 000 ) more viewers tune in for League games each weekend. You`d think that`d more than, or at least equally compensate for the fact that 560 000 less viewers tune in for longer for fumbleballs.
I’m guessing he’s from melb
That's still talking about ratings, it's just a different metric.
What are you even talking about lol? The amount of people watching is already factored into that data.
I live in Newcastle, the true RL heartland.
Lol I’m guessing maths is a struggle
Christ it’s painful trying to read posts of the trolls on this forum.
Your point maybe correct for fta but fox relies on subs so hours watched doesn’t mean anything to them
Ratings may give fox an idea of how many people subscribe for that product. Because of your industry experience you may know if fox can track individual data or do they have the same system as fta with the Neilson box?
Hey if you don’t understand the point thats not on me is it
My point is simply that you can’t just ignore that number when analysing data like this. I agree that it’s a much more relevant figure for FTA.
I understand the point fine. I just don’t understand why LU trolls all have this weird thing where they randomly press enter and don’t really seem to use grammar at all.
So you understood the point
Wrong about what? The fact that AFL games are longer and therefore get more total viewing hours is a metric that can’t be ignored. Most on here like to ignore that stat when discussing ratings or potential TV deals because it doesn’t fit with a set agenda.
