Vic, that is true. You have analysed well. I hate to say this about a South's bloke, especially a junior - who has lived in Morehead St, but he initiates very little. Only in the last few desperate minutes did he decide to take a few steps to make the opposition guess for a least another second or two to give room to outside support. Raider's defence was tight, but that is easier to achieve when the attack is predictable. It has been galling for a few seasons to have a long, deepish pass from dummy half to a standing half back who just shovels the ball on. By the time the next player receives the ball, the defence has already crossed the advantage line. Compare that to Cooper Cronk who last year won a preliminary final, then a Grand Final, with one shoulder: essentially meaning that Easts won the two biggest games of the year with only 12 men. Souths need a consistent organiser.
Cook did have a poor game - he often looked lost. That may be down to Reynolds not calling any shots, or not being in position to receive. However, the number of times Cook collected a play the ball and then had to look around for someone to throw to was just amateurish. But I put that mostly down to Cook not marshalling someone as he is running to the tackle area. Compare Cameron Smith who just knows where he wants the next 2 to 3 plays to be. He will nod, hand signal, or tell a play as he is running to his next dummy half position. That is why the Storm are mostly fluent and on song. Souths just looked unrehearsed.
Cook’s passing is often a bit lobby which gives the defence that extra time to be in the face of a receiver who is standing waiting for the pass to drop into the hands. That is a mortal sin for a modern-day footballer. It is amazing watching the crisp, flat passing in front of a runner by Rugby players who have to be exact since, in essence, they play under a “one metre rule”. If Rugby clubs can ask former NRL players to coach their charges in defence, then we should ask them to teach us how to pass (and catch in the one motion).
When the Raiders were down to 12 men and we were pressing their line, Cook was lost when he had the ball. His poor kick gifted the ball to a tiring Raiders who within two more sets had scored at the other end to clinch the night. That blunder capped a last quarter of embarrassment that saw him stripped in a one-on-one 10 metres out; forgetting how to count to six and passing to barging forward on the last; trying to take a rampaging Papalii high only to be brushed off and present a clear run to the line for the Raider.
We had a tonne of possession in the second half. We should have won by heaps. What summed up the night was the 64th minute when Walker gave the ball to decoy Graham 8 metres out who was squashed by 3 tacklers. If Walker had passed behind the decoy the resulting overlap would have seen us in for a try. Too many times the wrong option was selected.
We did better than what I had hoped for at the start of the year, but when seeing how we slaughtered ourselves, yet still only lost by 6, then is hurts to think of what might have been.