Agreed, but he is also a little erratic :lol:
Geez, some of you blokes are being very kind to Roberts and his ability as a playmaker.
All true and I am very happy to have him on board. Though they may have areas to work on Roberts, Sandow and Reni are ALL attacking players and that is something our team desperately needs to allow Hayne some freedom.You take the good with the bad.
I doubt we'll split halves with Sandow in the side so Roberts won't get so much ball anyway.
Probably because we didn't start watching the NRL last year and we've actually seen Roberts at his best.
all those stats show is that Roberts made more kicks, and subsequently more metres gained in an almost linear relationship with respect to the amount of kicks the others had, esp KK
and sadly for us, i have never considered Roberts a great kicker
Geez, some of you blokes are being very kind to Roberts and his ability as a playmaker.
You take the good with the bad.
I doubt we'll split halves with Sandow in the side so Roberts won't get so much ball anyway.
Probably because we didn't start watching the NRL last year and we've actually seen Roberts at his best.
Well that alone already puts him streets in front of our current halves. Who we got you could say that about?When did you start watching Poo, 2009? Ben Roberts is ordinary. Can be a good ball runner and has a nice grubber at times but that is it.
Geez, some of you blokes are being very kind to Roberts and his ability as a playmaker.
As a Parra supporter, I think it's important that we have a player we can use a scapegoat for every loss. Ben Roberts should fill that role nicely.
Ben Roberts is ordinary. Can be a good ball runner and has a nice grubber at times but that is it.
who cares how far he kicks the ball as long as it doesnt go out on the full'Almost linear'?
Roberts: 32.6 metres/kick
Keating: 28.25
Hodkinson: 23.83
Now, metres per kick doesn't tell the whole story (short attacking kicks will drop your average, and there's no indication of where the kick landed) but at the moment it's all we've got unless we look at the video.
Roberts made over 4 m/k more than the next guy, which is an extra 14% of Keating's metres per kick.
The fact he made more kicks for longer clearly shows he was the team's number 1 long kicking option. This in a team with a noted long kicker.
Perhaps round 15 is a better indicator:
Roberts 7 kicks (225m)
Keating 5 kicks (137m)
He's not; he's a good kicker. Why do you have to resort to ad absurdum bullshit to try and prove your point? I never said he's a great kicker, and he doesn't have to be to add something to our team.
Yeah you're right. We should've stuck with Morts or Robbo at 6 next year.
I think we should have tried Humble at 6 before we paid more for someone who has produced little with a great deal more opportunity - but that's just me.
If Roberts doesn't get the first grade spot, at least we have good depth.
I'm all for Humble being given a shot, after his past couple of games for Wenty (and thank f**k for Wednesday afternoon NSW Cup on Fox). I'd like to see him come into our side next weekend (i.e. not 2 days after playing for NSW Residents).
But since we've signed Roberts out of reserve grade he won't be on much ($100k-$150k I reckon) and if we lock Humble up for a few more years I don't expect it would be any more than that.
And if we let Humble go at the end of the year it's because the coach didn't rate him. I reckon he knows more about the players than any of us.
Either way, with our halves options after Sandow being on less than regular starter's money (with the exception of Mortimer who is on a first grade half's pay), we're free to experiment with next year's 6 jersey.
Ben Roberts at his best is one of the most damaging halves in the game. At his worst he's a solid kicker and defender who makes a few errors. He's an excellent addition to the squad.
His role will be to complement Sandow & Hayne plus prolly to a lesser extent Matuia. More than a handy player to fit that role.