OK YOU can have a one weak trial and see how you f**king go.glockers said:The number of mistakes is disturbing and most are blatantly obvious. I'm a trained journalist and volunteer to take their job. Seriously it is a pretty week effort.
sullyfan said:In that case, some articles on Michael Sullivan and Michael Witt please. ;-)
Care to try again, Mr. Journalist?glockers said:The number of mistakes is disturbing and most are blatantly obvious. I'm a trained journalist and volunteer to take their job. Seriously it is a pretty week effort.
Ian Millward said:WHO gives a ****. get a life
HevyDevy said:The main problem seems is that the majority of the magazine is thrown together in two days - after the weekend's games. So that does put the pressure on. That doesn't mean though that we dismiss the mistakes we make. We're not at all happy with the number of errors in this week's issue.
I'll keep in mind that everyone seems to want Premier League scores in every week. They'll be back in next week's issue apparently (no I'm not the editor but they'll be there).
The stats - well they all come in differently. The stats you see in stat attack are supplied in that format directly from NRL Stats and the designers here just flow the text in.
The stats down the side of the team pages are also supplied by NRL stats but need to be typed in manually on each page so whoever typed them in this week obviously stuffed up with Cronulla and Melbourne.
It's good to get this sort of constructive feedback though so thanks. Feel free to keep telling me what you like and don't like in the mag. We can't always promise to fulfil everyone's wishes but we're always trying to improve.
*Paul* said:Funny thing, I stopped getting RLW a few years ago, 'cause I get fed up with the mistakes.