Brisbane Bombers not keen to be rushed into NRL if Sharks fold

Discussion in 'NRL Expansion' started by El Diablo, Mar 10, 2013.

  1. El Diablo

    El Diablo Post Whore

    Joined:
    May 21, 2003
    Messages:
    94,108
    Likes Received:
    7,902
    http://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/br...l-if-sharks-fold/story-fndujljl-1226594341253

     
  2. Diesel

    Diesel Coach

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    14,543
    Likes Received:
    6,830
    Too bloody bad, the NRL will do what's best for the comp, not what's best for a plastic-carbon copy of the Broncos
     
  3. The Great Dane

    The Great Dane Bench

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4,416
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Of course the bid teams are against relocation, if a team relocates to their area then their team does not get in.

    Simple selfishness, they don't want any rugby league team in their area, they want their rugby league team in their area, even if it is at the detriment of the rest of the competition. I completely understand wanting their own team, but it is selfish none the less.
     
  4. Clarke

    Clarke Juniors

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Makes sense and I agree with them.

    If the Sharks can no longer exist in Cronulla, they should be offered the chance to relocate to Adelaide. If they do not want to do that and choose to fold. The NRL should rush the Central Coast Bears in as a quick replacement and then later expansion to Perth and 2nd Brisbane.
     
  5. The Mad Hatter

    The Mad Hatter Coach

    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12,024
    Likes Received:
    7,304
    I don't know why areas should have a relocated team foisted on them.

    But, if the Sharks brand survives, and relocation is required, and a city wants them...well...good luck.
     

Share This Page