What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Caught in dead-in-goal zone

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
Caught in dead-in-goal zone
Opinion by Ray Chesterton
June 1, 2004

PARRAMATTA coach Brian Smith is taking more hits than a "Paris Hilton does Australia Nude" website.

Paul Langmack's got a herd of cattle at Souths that would not bring enough money to buy a coaching manual if you sold them as gravy beef.

And across the Tasman Daniel Anderson has a team which could do the Haka carrying machine guns and not scare the opposition.

But Smith, Langmack and Anderson are in the dead-in-goal zone of supporters' ire because their teams are failing.

The term "dead men walking" is as fitting for rugby league coaches as it is for men on death row.

All three coaches are in jeopardy. Langmack is under most pressure but expected to survive a Souths board meeting tonight.

Parramatta, under Smith, have lost five in a row and show no encouraging signs.

It is a degenerating situation that may well leave Parramatta so corroded with disillusionment and resentment it will take years to recover.

How much of the blame should be carried by Smith or by Langmack and Anderson for their teams' problems?

Ironically Smith and Anderson have better coaching records, having taken teams to grand finals, than the CVs of many of their players.

So were Smith and Anderson totally responsible for the asinine, unprofessional and embarrassing performances of a mob of well-paid, supposedly competitive players last week-end?

Or do the players have to carry some responsibility.

Smith's time at Parramatta may well have gone well past its use-by date. It is impossible to see any coach reversing the momentum of a side that has careered out of control at warp speed under his recent guidance.

At best, Smith and Parramatta are incompatible. At worst he is a hindrance.

I thought Langmack squeezed every drop of commitment Souths had to offer, especially to lead Cronulla on Saturday night at halftime.

They fell away in the second half, as they will continue to do under any coach, because they lack experience and mental toughness to last 80 minutes.

But they are the best Souths can muster on a small budget.

On Sunday Parramatta were puerile. They were an acute embarrassment to everyone at the club from administrators to the coach and players.

Smith's tactics may have been unsuitable, they may have been tragically wrong and easily exploited by the opposition.

But he was not responsible for the ineptitude.

He was not to blame for Parramatta kicking out on the full from a restart which follows three conceded penalties from fouled restarts two weeks ago.

He was not responsible for a Parramatta player running 30m clear on Sunday and being surrounded by five Tigers with no support player in sight.

And Smith did not drop the ball in the Tigers' in-goal as Parramatta did or lose a feed against the head.

Burning effigies of Smith for childlike team errors while exonerating the players, will leave you with burnt fingers.


chestertonr@ dailytelegraph.com.au

The Daily Telegraph
 

Misty Bee

First Grade
Messages
7,082
Colonel, you Smith lovers were churning out that one 2 years ago.

What has he done about it? What CAN he do about it?

I notice you didn't highlight THESE lines...

"
Smith's time at Parramatta may well have gone well past its use-by date. It is impossible to see any coach reversing the momentum of a side that has careered out of control at warp speed under his recent guidance.

At best, Smith and Parramatta are incompatible. At worst he is a hindrance.

Smith signed these players. There is not a player in our club who wasnt signed by Smith to their current contracts. While no one can argue thaqt Smith doesn't drop the balls etc, Smith has an enormous influence on the players who do.

Why oh why some people claim that he isn't accountable is utterly beyond me!
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
Misty Bee said:
Why oh why some people claim that he isn't accountable is utterly beyond me!

I'm just playing the cards where they lie MB.

From this morning's post.

Colonel Eel - June 01 8.26 am said:
Part of me thinks that maybe he has gone on too long. My main concern has been, and is the very reason for me asking for him to be stood down, that he may leave at the end of the season if he feels he cannot offer anymore. Selfishly, I feel such a decision needs to be made earlier rather than later so as the club is able to recruit the players, who through influence of the media or their peers may not necessarily be interested in coming to Parramatta. While people have questioned my motives on this, I still stand firm in my belief that this would be in the best interest of the club and the players. This is not to say that it was a spur of the moment decision - its one that has probably festered over the years since 2001.

The players and the board have chosen to stick with Smith. For how long I don't know. I will remain faithful to them for their decision. Its not my mind or a lot of those that post here that you need to change Misty.
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
Misty Bee said:
Are you HAPPY with their decision?

Whether I am happy with their decision or not makes no difference to them does it?

As I said they have chosen this and if that is their decision then I will back that decision up.
 

Misty Bee

First Grade
Messages
7,082
Don't avoid the question. Surely you have an opinion, or doesn you opinion not matter?
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
Misty Bee said:
Don't avoid the question. Surely you have an opinion, or doesn you opinion not matter?

In some circles I would doubt that my opinion would raise an eyebrow.

Am I happy - yes and no. I'm going to reserve my decision for at least a week though......
 

Latest posts

Top