lockyno1
Post Whore
- Messages
- 53,293
Balmain_Boy said:Mate, my issue is not with Clarke not being picked. I'm not saying he should be re-picked after one decent dig at state level. I'm just citing the irony of Lockyno1 saying Clarke has not done enough but still advocating Symonds . Symonds did not deserve to be picked. That is the issues. It really has nothing to do with Clarke. Where I've written Clarke, insert any other Australian Batsmen with the credentials and the point stands.
FFS mate, one is an all-rounder and one is a batsman. I am not disagreeing with you that Symonds' bowling is handy but nothing else at test level, but he is picked as an all-rounder! Clarke is not, he is a batsman. The selectors are going with a new format, with 5 batsman, 1 all-rounder, gilly, and 4 bowlers. Now Clarke has to fit into the 5 batsman and quite frankly he aint going to knock Hodge or Hussey out yet with 3 scores when these two have been scoring for years! Symonds is the best all-rounder we have got at the moment with Watson injured and Hopes not bowling yet, so we have to realise he will be picked. Symonds deserves a chance, but I am still not saying he is our all-rounder. He will play till Watson is back. Simple.