It’s vanity projects. I have immense respect for anyone throwing money into a lower league club. It’s not a business decision, it’s a toy. You’re losing that money but there’s no future in it. No TV deals, small crowds, low viability and paying players a weekly wage. It’s just such a poor business model and it’s little wonder it’s going this way.
Super League can’t go giving millions out to the lower leagues, in the way the NRL does to QRL/NSWRL. They don’t have the money to do so. The RFL does not either. The clubs aren’t propped up by casinos and income producing assets in the way some are in Australia. Most here rent football grounds, council facilities or rugby union grounds. They’ll likely make little to nothing on beer and pies sold and income will purely be ticket and merchandise sales.
It’s sad. There’s so much history in the lower leagues. You’ve got unbeaten seasons, multiple Challenge Cup winners, some have even been Kings of England at one point or another and won the top division. They are proud clubs built on communities and local identities. The issue is what was once present is now history and that’s the case with the lower league of rugby league.
We simply don’t have the central funding, clubs don’t have the revenue to pay players and we have a whole competition that is almost invisible to the world - barring the odd club who shows games live online. Things need to change. It’s going to be tough conversations and time for massive change. Most clubs would fail to meet the criteria for taking part in the National Conference League set up but that has been taken over by The RFL by force, so maybe the entry requirements could be changed to accommodate the Hunslet’s and Rochdale’s of the world?
The immediate concern is the fixture list. I haven’t looked too deeply into it but I know London had lost two fixtures with Featherstone when they went, they are also due to play Halifax twice. The two Featherstone games were to be replaced by games with Hunslet but what now? More replacements?