I was thinking the same thing this morning. He must have done something or said something to or about Doust which is why I want him as the next coach, not a yes man. I doubt we will here anything from Doust as he has never had to substantiate anything he has done or said in the past this won’t be any differentAssuming the vote has to be unanimous:
If Doust is in a battle with other board members, I’d be interested to learn of his reasoning behind his anti-flanno veto.
Just a simple statement listing his reasons so everyone can consider the merits of it and make an assessment.
Nobody has really told us why he is against Flanno.
That he was embroiled in peptides and broke NRL rules is a given. That he was a cheat is understood. That he did nothing good helping Mary is also true.
Are there other reasons for Dousts strong feelings on this matter which we don’t know about?
Doust is taking on some powerful adversaries in the media to stymie Flanno. It’s a big call. He’s risking a lot. Why?