Voice of Reason
Juniors
- Messages
- 359
Has it occured to anyone else that 5 of the remaining 6 teams in the competition, and 6 of the original 8, were ex-Superleague teams!! Add to that, the two non-Superleague teams (Rooters and Knights) were the most vocal non-Superleague powers and spent the most money buying players. What message, if any, does this convey. You could be excused to conclude that the way for success is to buy it (players). Could it be that the top 6 clubs now, some of whom are still propped-up with News Ltd money, are benefiting from past extravagant expenditure in the Superleague era? Any thoughts out there?
PS: I know that "the war is over", I am not hung-up on the past wrong-doings of clubs, administrators and players, but, I am simply making an observation.
PS: I know that "the war is over", I am not hung-up on the past wrong-doings of clubs, administrators and players, but, I am simply making an observation.