What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Could we still end up with inglis???

Messages
2,227
Greg Inglis's future in the NRL remains up in the air after the NRL blocked his proposed move to South Sydney on Saturday.

The NRL advised the Rabbitohs that it must include the full value of a number of third-party agreements relating to the Queensland Origin star's $400,000-per-year deal.
Inglis, who reneged on a deal to sign with the Brisbane Broncos when third party deals failed to materialise, will now continue to remain in rugby league limbo as he is without a club for 2011.
In a statement released on Saturday, the NRL explained that the rules are in place to "ensure that any third-party agreement is not in truth a vehicle to remunerate the player for playing rugby league at his club".
"Given the circumstances under which Greg Inglis became available to South Sydney, nobody can have been under any doubt about the importance of ensuring his contract complied with the cap," NRL chief executive David Gallop said.
"The NRL had already required the Broncos to include third-party agreements within their calculation of the contract value and was insisting legal fees also be included when those negotiations ceased.
"South Sydney had been advised to have all proposed offers reviewed by the NRL before making any commitments.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.





End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.


"They chose not to do so and it has taken some time to access all details of the agreements.
"It is unfortunate for Greg that he is in the middle of a difficult situation and I assured him this week that these issues do not reflect on him but that they are matters for clubs in assessing the offers that they make.
"He is one of the games most highly-valued players and we have assured him of that in no uncertain terms.
"That said the cap has to apply fairly to all clubs and one club cannot be allowed to do what others were prevented from doing.
"The rules on third-party deals are clear.
"We have worked with clubs and players by substantially increasing the amount that sponsors can pay players through the $300,000 marquee player allowance in 2011 but without rules on third party agreements there would be no point in having a salary cap system."
South Sydney admitted they were "disappointed" and disagree with the decision, and will assess the situation this week with NRL salary cap auditor Ian Schubert.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/...-in-league-limbo/story-fn2mcuj6-1225973134895
 

Bigfella

Coach
Messages
10,102
You would have to wonder where his head would be by the time he was joining his fourth club in three months.

On balance though the potential upside is so high, and the downside so low (seeing we have so much cap space available) we would have to have a lash IMO
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
17,930
You would have to at least think we'd make an offer. Inglis seems to like cash and he might be swayed when a cheque with lots of zeros is in front of him.

With the outside backs we have bought i'd try inglis at 6
 

Latest posts

Top