What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cricket TV rights

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
If cricket wants to stay relevant, it must be on FTA TV as much as possible. Getting the BBL on FTA would help the game far more than the dollars given up with no giving it to Foxtel.
 

undertaker

Coach
Messages
10,817
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the days before Optus/Sports Australia/C7 televised Sheffield Shield matches (from the 95/96 Final to 2001/02), weren't Sheffield Shield matches televised by Ch9? I'm aware that they used to cover domestic one-day matches on Saturday and Sunday (when it didn't clash with international matches), but I'm absolutely sure Shield matches were also shown on Ch9.
 
Last edited:

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
Channel 9 to make call on cricket TV rights as early as next week
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...rly-as-next-week/story-e6frectl-1226644609874


THE dramatic $500 million battle over cricket's television rights is on course to be settled much sooner than expected.
While Channel 9 has a month to decide whether it will match rival Ten's audacious half-billion dollar attempt to claim Nine's summer centrepiece, industry sources believe a decision will be made late next week.

Nine is widely expected to retain the rights to international cricket it has held for more than three decades, but much will depend on discussions in Los Angeles between chief executive David Gyngell and the company's US hedge fund owners.

The network would be forced to increase its annual payment from $45 million under the current deal to $80 million over five years, while Ten would be left paying $20 million a year for the domestic Big Bash Twenty20 competition.



Nine is under increased financial pressure following last year's successful billion dollar, five-year deal for the NRL rights, which is believed to be losing about $30 million a year.

An almost doubling of the international cricket rights would leave Nine with another significant loss leader.

Poorly rating Ten would also lose money paying $100 million over five years for the Big Bash, but is desperate to attract significant sports content.

Fox Sports has done an outstanding job showing the first two seasons of the revamped eight-team Big Bash, but has no interest in matching Ten's offer.

Cricket Australia is excited about the extra exposure the Big Bash will receive on free to air, lifting its viewers from about 250,000 a match on Fox Sports, one of its highest rating events, to an estimated 700,000 to 800,000.

While the big winner appears to be the Big Bash, the loser looks to be the unloved Ryobi Cup.

Despite a proposal to turn the meandering the state-based 50-over competition into an October carnival, it appears no network is interested in spending more than $2 million in production costs for little return.
 

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
I used to love watching the domestic 50 over comp on Nine. What was it? The Mercantile Mutual Cup? They used to show indoor cricket too, or was that on another channel? Can't recall ever seeing the Sheffield Shield though...
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
I think this shows how poorly domestic cricket rates.

As a very long time cricket fan I have real doubts about its long term future.

Certain games rate. Though most are day games and like Day RL rates poorly. I assume if it's on FTA. They will have D/N shown it will make it good for One HD especially. Though you will still get the SA V Tas games most of the country don't care about but generally the games will hold their own
 

JW

Coach
Messages
12,657
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...stralian-cricket/story-fni2fnmo-1226649497720

Channel Nine may be forced out of bidding war for rights to televise Australian cricket
Robert Craddock
The Courier-Mail
May 24, 2013 12:00AM

CHANNEL 9 chief executive David Gyngell faces one of his biggest calls after being advised by key shareholders to drop out of the bidding for Australian cricket rights.

Mr Gyngell's sentimental link to Nine's 36-year hold on the rights has become the pivotal factor of the final days of a protracted bidding war between channels Nine and Ten.

It was revealed yesterday two US-based hedge funds that are Nine's key shareholders believe the station should withdraw from the bidding rather than match Ten's $500 million bid for the rights to international and domestic cricket.

Such has been the ferocity of the bidding war that the station who gets the rights will make a substantial annual loss, though the promotion of other programs and the status of being the national cricket broadcaster is significant compensation.

During a meeting with the Nine board in the US last week, Oaktree Capital and Apollo Management reportedly gave the view the cricket rights would be too expensive.

One factor against Nine's retention of the rights is that Ten rather than Seven is its bidding rival.

Nine would have been desperate to retain the rights if its key rival was in the hunt.

Despite the hedge funds' advice Nine's bid is not dead because Mr Gyngell has been invited to put together a financial package which could match the Ten bid.

Mr Gyngell could elect to cut funds across the network for a revamped package. Or he may elect to walk away and unleash a major offensive for other prime time shows.

Nine will know the figure it must reach because it has the last bidding rights in the process.

Ten is desperate for a major sports franchise to lift its modest ratings and sees cricket as a basis from which to rebuild the business.

Its spirited bidding effort for the cricket rights has lifted the station's profile and, according to industry sources, enhanced its appeal to advertisers.
 

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
Aussie Broadcasters Square Off Over Cricket Rights

By Ross Kelly
The Ashes isn’t the only closely fought contest taking place in the cricket world this year.
Nine Entertainment Co. has long held the rights to broadcast live fixtures on Australian free-to-air television, but could be stumped by a rival bid from Ten Network Holdings Ltd.
Nine’s grip on the TV rights dates back to the 1970s when the late Kerry Packer, who owned the network, wrested control from the Australian Broadcasting Corp. In a move that transformed a sleepy sport into glamorous and lucrative spectacle, Mr. Packer launched a breakaway league known as World Series Cricket that featured greats of the game like Tony Greig and Dennis Lillee.
ES-AC918_criclo_E_20130430234209.jpg
Australia’s captain Michael Clarke hits a boundary during the second day’s play of their third cricket test match against Sri Lanka at the Sydney Cricket Ground January 4, 2013. REUTERS/Tim WimborneREUTERS​
In a twist resembling a Shane Warne leg-break, the rights could once again rest with the Packer family–at least indirectly.
Kerry Packer’s son James is among a group of billionaires that have invested in the struggling Ten Network.
A Ten Network spokesman confirmed it recently lodged a bid for the rights, but wouldn’t verify Australian media reports that it has offered around 500 million Australian dollars (US$481.9 million) in payments spread over five years.
Even if Ten Network’s bid is accepted, Nine can match it. “We have an opportunity to make the final bid,” a spokeswoman for Nine told MoneyBeat.
Cricket Australia, the sport’s main governing body, said it has received “significant interest” in the rights, but wouldn’t comment further. Australia’s squad is due to take the field against England in the first of five Ashes tests in the U.K. in mid-July, with a return series down under over Christmas.
Ten Network swung to a first-half loss after it was hurt by weak advertising markets and a series of program flops including reality show “Being Lara Bingle” about the ex-girlfriend of current Australian cricket captain Michael Clarke.
The Sydney-based network, which also counts Lachlan Murdoch and mining magnate Gina Rinehart as major shareholders, has churned through three chief executive officers in quick succession as it attempts to return to profit.
Securing the rights would form a key plank in current CEO Hamish McLennan’s attempt to broaden Ten Network’s appeal. He’s already secured rights to broadcast the 2014 Winter Olympics.
However, an offer of A$500 million would almost be as high as Ten’s market value of A$686 million.
Deutsche Bank's Jennifer Kruk reckons a bid of that size probably wouldn’t be profitable in its own right, although it could allow promotional activities that are hard to value.
Cricket generates about A$60 million in free-to-air television advertising revenue each year, plus A$20 million in production costs that are currently split between Nine and cable television outfit Foxtel. That makes a bid averaging A$100 million annually over five years appear hard to stack up.
A worse-than-expected revenue performance could even put Ten in breach of its debt covenants, she says.
“While we are generally supportive of Ten’s sport strategy, the thought of a A$500 million bid does make us nervous, particularly if a large upfront payment is required,” says Ms. Kruk, who rates Ten Network at Hold.
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013...off-over-cricket-rights/?mod=google_news_blog
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,272
Looking more and more like it's going to go to ten.

Please god, let it go to ten.
 

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
Nine uncertain over deal

Date May 28, 2013

Jon Pierik

Sports writer with The Age







art-353-svJBROWNE-300x0.jpg
Jeff Browne. Photo: Joe Armao

Channel Nine says it remains uncertain if it will match Ten's $500 million bid to poach the rights to international and domestic cricket.
Nine's managing director, Jeff Browne, said the network was undecided about launching a counter-offer, with the Cricket Australia deadline next Monday.
He said money was not the only issue, and his network had had positive discussions with CA, despite industry speculation there were simmering tensions between the two parties.
Talks broke down earlier this month over the issue of domestic cricket, with CA lodging a writ in the Supreme Court of Victoria, due to be heard on Friday.
As reported by Fairfax Media, the writ is to clarify the status of the Big Bash League and whether it is subject to Nine's last right of refusal - given this form of the game did not exist in Australia at the time of Nine's last deal.
Nine sources labelled the legal case by CA a ''sideshow'', saying it was disappointed with the games being played by CA's lawyers given the network has no interest in the BBL.
Ten's five-year offer is understood to be worth $400 million for the international rights and $100 million for the BBL.
Nine argues it only needs to match the $400 million to retain the rights.
Nine's two US-based hedge fund shareholders, Apollo Management and Oaktree Capital, have reportedly suggested they do not want Nine to bid for the rights but are willing to budge if they can be persuaded the investment is worthwhile. The network reportedly has new debts of about $700 million.
Nine's nine-member board includes four hedge fund directors, and former federal treasurer Peter Costello.
Fox Sports has broadcast the BBL, but Ten is favoured to at least grab this even if the international rights remain with Nine. Ten has not ruled out on-selling some matches to pay TV.
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/sport/cricket/nine-uncertain-over-deal-20130527-2n7k0.html
 

Red Bear

Referee
Messages
20,882
I'll miss Richie, Bill and Tubbs, and it would certainly feel strange not having them on the broadcast
 

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
Nine's owners fly in for TV deals





NINE Entertainment Co's US hedge fund owners Apollo and Oaktree are flying into Sydney today for emergency talks about buying billionaire Bruce Gordon's Adelaide and Perth television stations.

It is understood Mr Gordon is willing to do a deal and the hedge funds are set to meet with WIN representatives. The development comes as the clock ticks down on the looming deadline set by Cricket Australia for Nine to match Ten Network's $450 million-plus bid for its broadcast rights.
Nine's move on Mr Gordon's two stations, which are operated by his private regional broadcaster WIN Corp, and the battle for the cricket rights are inextricably linked.
As the custodian of Australia's only truly national sport, CA has demanded that the rights holder guarantees national coverage.
The Adelaide program supply agreement has one year to run, while the Perth contract will soon expire.
At this point in the negotiations with Mr Gordon, Nine is only able to offer Cricket Australia long-term coverage in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Newcastle.
Mr Gordon is refusing to bow to Nine chief executive David Gyngell's demands to pay higher fees, so Mr Gyngell has offered to buy the stations from him.
Mr Gyngell also wants to retain the cricket rights, but the hedge funds are said to be willing to pay up only for Adelaide and Perth, and view the price to keep the cricket as excessive.
The cricket deal is a five-year contract, and the hedge funds have a quick turnaround exit strategy that involves floating Nine within the next 12 months. They have become spooked by the emerging currency risk that could devalue their original investment in Nine -- the Australian dollar has fallen more than 6 per cent since the start of the month.
As the situation gets closer to a resolution, another twist may emerge.
It is believed that Mr Gordon would rather sell the stations to Nine than retain the cricket rights through his affiliation agreement.
If he sells up, Mr Gordon may turn his attention to a merger with Ten, in which he owns a 15 per cent stake, after selling Perth and Adelaide to Nine.
If Ten can win the cricket rights, Mr Gordon would still be able to air cricket coverage on his remaining WIN stations through a tie-up with Ten.
Under the terms of Nine's offer to buy the stations, it is understood Nine will buy the Adelaide station immediately, with an option to buy the Perth station after the federal election, if the controversial 75 per cent population reach rule is repealed.
Nine's ownership of Newcastle-based television station NBN and stations in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane means that a combined move for Mr Gordon's Adelaide and Perth stations would breach the reach threshold enshrined in the 1992 Broadcasting Services Act.
If the reach rule is abolished after the election, Mr Gyngell can exercise an option to buy the Perth station under the offer terms.
UBS Australasia chief executive Matthew Grounds has been mandated by Nine to work on the deal, with corporate law firm Gilbert + Tobin doing the legal work.
Sources said the imminent talks between the US hedge funds and WIN were likely to take place at Gilbert + Tobin's Sydney offices.
Gilbert + Tobin was the scene of a media frenzy in October when Mr Gyngell, the Nine board and its shareholders held talks to refinance its billion-dollar debt pile.
In the end, a settlement was reached and Nine was saved from administration in a debt-for-equity swap that handed control of Nine to Apollo and Oaktree.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/nines-owners-fly-in-for-tv-deals/story-e6frg996-1226654086566
 

undertaker

Coach
Messages
10,817

Oh no. PLEAAAAAAAASE let this not be true.

Also, I believe on the anti-siphoning list that all Australian matches played in England have to be shown on FTA (like the ODI series Australia has played over there in non-Ashes years). However, I see no listing of the Champions Trophy matches in the tv guide.

And also, what is it with this U.S. Hedge Funds company that I keep hearing about regarding Channel 9? They must be raking in quite a bit in consultancy fees having their representatives flying back and forth to Australia.
 
Last edited:

juro

Bench
Messages
3,798
Nine pads up for cricket deal

PUBLISHED: 02 Jun 2013 15:11:00 | UPDATED: 03 Jun 2013 09:30:13
8c087ccc-cb6d-11e2-8581-e76fb3c9f2fe_169768234--646x363.jpg
If Nine Entertainment succeeds in its bid for cricket broadcasting rights, Nine is likely to own the rights to the Test matches and one-day internationals, with the Big Bash competition going to Ten. Photo: Getty Images

Ben Holgate
Nine Entertainment Co’s hedge fund owners and the board have given the green light for chief executive David Gyngell to match Ten Network Holdings’ audacious $550 million bid for the right to broadcast cricket, with the networks set to share the rights for the next five years.
The size of the existing offer is a big win for Cricket Australia boss James Sutherland, who will achieve his aim of increasing cricket’s annual revenue through domestic media rights by about twice as much as under the old deal.
Nine’s board, which met on Sunday, has also given the go-ahead for the free-to-air television, digital and ticketing group to acquire WIN Corp’s Adelaide station with an option to buy its Perth station.
However, both deals rest on Mr Gyngell and his management team. They are believed to be facing difficult last-minute negotiations with WIN Corp owner the billionaire Bruce Gordon. Nine is also trying to strike a number of smaller side deals – such as a contract to on-sell digital broadcasting rights for the international cricket to Telstra and a higher fee from regional affiliates – to help pay for the cricket bid.



Tipped to match Ten’s $550m bid

The network is widely expected to match Ten’s $500 million in cash bid plus an additional $50 million in contra advertising for the five-year cricket rights, which start in 2013-14.
Nine has last rights and has until today to finalise an offer for the sport it has broadcast for 36 years.
Nine would win the rights to televise Test matches and one-day internationals, with the Big Bash competition (costing about $20 million a year) likely to go to Ten. Fox Sports Australia previously owned the rights to domestic games.
This would leave Nine paying about $80 million a year in cash plus $10 million in contra advertising for the rights, which includes both television and digital media.
Cricket Australia is understood to be keen to monetise the digital rights, and is considering either joint ventures or partnerships with the winning bidder.
Although Nine’s decision about whether to bid for the cricket is not dependent on its talks with WIN, the two issues have been running concurrently and both may come to a head on Monday.
It is understood that Nine and WIN had not reached agreement on prices for the stations by Sunday.
Mr Gordon is overseas.
Nine cannot own both the Adelaide and Perth stations unless the 75 per cent reach rule is abolished, hence the need for an option on the West Australian station.
Unlikely to scrap reach rule

The rule prevents a TV licence holder from reaching more than 75 per cent of the national population. However, it is unlikely the rule will be scrapped in the short term following the Labor government’s botched attempt to get rid of it earlier this year.
Sources confirmed the two WIN stations were likely to be valued on earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) multiples of between eight and 11 times.
It is understood WIN’s Adelaide station generates about $15 million a year in EBITDA, and its Perth station about $22 million. This implies a valuation range of $120 million to $165 million for Adelaide, and a range of $176 million to $242 million for Perth.
Mr Gordon wants to sell the stations in order to clean up WIN’s asset portfolio and to realise some cash, in order to de-risk the privately held group, said a source. WIN is believed to have a modest amount of debt.
Mr Gordon is also interested in possibly merging WIN’s TV assets with Ten at a later date, said sources. Mr Gordon is Ten’s largest shareholder with a stake of about 15 per cent. However, a merger of WIN’s regional TV business with Ten would require the scrapping of the reach rule.
Big Bash move ‘good for Ten’

Nine owns stations in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and would receive revenue and synergy benefits if it were to by either – or both – of WIN’s Adelaide and Perth stations. Cricket Australia simply wants to ensure the rights holder can guarantee a national broadcast of the sport.
Nine’s regional affiliation agreement with WIN expired last June, and they have been on a rolling deal since. Nine’s program supply deal for WIN’s Perth station expires this month, and that for the Adelaide station ends next year.
Although the US hedge funds that control Nine – Oaktree Capital and Apollo Global Management – had previously expressed concern about the high price, they indicated they would not stand in the way if management could mount a convincing business case. Citigroup analyst Justin Diddams said sports rights were increasingly valuable in a market where viewers are fragmented across television and internet platforms. He said buying the rights to the Big Bash domestic Twenty20 competition was a good move for Ten.
http://www.afr.com/p/business/sunday/nine_decides_over_cricket_rights_yQvOozAzv9mBpITb6z21CK
 

Panther_Daz

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
7,901
Channel 9 have retained the rights according to their Facebook page. More to come in 9 news.

Good news for the game with a massive injection of cash.

Grass roots to benefit.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
66,228
ch9 retain rights for the next 5 years

500 million dollar deal

players get 27% of the cricket revenue (I think it was 25% before ??)

source ch9 news
 
Last edited:

undertaker

Coach
Messages
10,817
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket...ket-rights-in-record-deal-20130603-2nlsm.html

Channel Nine has officially retained the rights to broadcast international cricket in Australia for the next five years.
In the richest television agreement in the game's history, Nine will pay in the region of $450 million in cash and contra advertising to televise home international matches between November and February. Nine trumped Network Ten by exercising its last-rights privilege from its previous contract with Cricket Australia.
Nine management signed the documentation for the deal in Sydney at 4.10pm on Monday afternoon, 50 minutes before the deadline, formally clinching the sought-after broadcast rights.
"Nine Entertainment is today a larger, stronger and more profitable company than it was yesterday," Nine chief executive David Gyngell said.
Advertisement
Staff at the network were told earlier on Monday that the network had kept the coverage of the cricket. The new deal will be formally announced by CA in Melbourne on Tuesday afternoon.
Ten, who had lodged a huge $550m bid to cover international games and the Twenty20 Big Bash League, have snatched the short-format competition for $20m a year over five years, taking it to free-to-air television from its previous rights holder, Fox Sports.
The bidding war between Nine and Ten has resulted in a major financial boon for Cricket Australia. In the previous seven-year association between CA and Nine the network paid only $45m a year. They will now dish out about $80m a year for the next five years.
The Nine and Ten deals - for international cricket and the Big Bash respectively - also add to a healthy overall television rights pie that has been compiled by CA.
As previously reported by Fairfax Media, when this rights package is combined with the existing deals for the coverage of matches in Australia in other parts of the world, including India, its 35 per cent share of the T20 Champions League and a dividend from the television rights for ICC competitions - the total value of CA's broadcast contracts now exceeds $1 billion.
 
Top