Big-Hitter said:
The RLEF should be pumping the most resources into nations that've already managed to get strong domestic structures set up under their own steam.
By my reckoning Lebanon and Serbia should be getting the most support as they have both managed to establish strong domestic comps with virtually no support.
By applying your logic I'd have to rate Russia ahead of both Lebanon and Serbia, as their domestic scene was established with little support other than which they initiated by venturing to the UK and it is continuing to grow.
If excluding the UK and France, I'd rate the European nations using your guidelines thus:
1. Russia: National league with 10 teams from 8 cities: Moscow, St.Petersburg, Yoshkar-Ola, Serpukhov, Krasnoznamensk, Kazan, Rostov, Naro-Forminsk. Several of those within the Moscow region. They also have junior development and women's rugby league, even if at a small scale.
2. Serbia: A small senior league and with junior development, Serbia could realistically overtake Russia's development in the next few years. Serbia tour and host internationals and are quite a progressive nation.
3. Lebanon: 5 senior clubs with an expansion club joining next season. Things are looking good and they aren't far from junior development. Their international program is looking strong and they are doing everything the right way.
4. Holland: The NNRLB has achieved a lot considering that it has faced a somewhat hostile Dutch RU and had to begin its life as a one man operation. Things have progressed slowly but surely and without any backward steps. Internationals on home soil, a first domestic club game and the successful hosting of 3 successive Dutch 9's has placed the Dutch a lot closer to being able to launch a domestic season.
5. Georgia: Able to field a strong national team due to the calibre of union players being fielded. Playing both home and away internationals, gaining TV coverage and pulling strong crowds and with several clubs training for a rugby league domestic season (funding would depend on its eventual launch). They could soon be pushing Lebanon for 3rd place.
6. Germany: Following the path set by Holland, Germany looks like it might have a smoother run than the Dutch in its very early days. Being able to learn from the triumphs and mistakes of others has been invaluable. I wouldn't be surprised to see Germany and Holland developing at one set pace, both pushing domestic developments with the help of the other and possibly with Austrian input as well.
7. Malta: Aussie based but like Lebanon they are serious and ready to play their first home international. Hopefully the match will see moves to establish the game in Malta sooner rather than later.
As for any other nations, well unless the RLEF starts getting multi million dollar funding injections I'd prefer to see them start their development work before putting their hand out. Latvia can't even handle developing rugby union let alone league. Italy are like irresponsible kids going for a joyride in an expensive car, they would be as big a waste of money as Samoa is/was. I believe that Greece will eventually make it to Athens, but probably not within the next 10-15 years. The project sounds like too low a priority for its organisers even with the project being genuine.