Country Dragon
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,272
IMO, he hasn't really been singled out by an opposition yet, that may come this weekend!
I agree with you about being a regular first grader. I don't think he is up for it just yet. But he is improving week by week.
I think the argument from my side is that Dugan is a better centre than any other options we have at the moment. He is strong, can bust tackles, defends well and runs a great line. We all saw what he can do close to the line with ball in hand (against the Titans).
With him at centre, I personally think it makes sense to bring Quinlan in as fullback. He provides some extra options in attack that have worked for us over the last few weeks. Yes there are deficiencies in his game as a fullback, but to date they haven't affected our ability to win with him there.
Dugan is our best fullback no doubt, but he is also our best centre. And for a better balance in the team it makes sense (at least to me) to keep it the way it is until we get back a few players from injuries. As they come back I have no doubt that Quinlan will be dropped.
Sorry Dez yeah I was replying to a couple of posts above.
Anyway, I just want some continuity and a plan in mind. For me, if Dugan is our fullback and he is available then he should always be fullback. Centre is more easily replaced and we still have options there, including players that we got for this very purpose.
Quinlan and Dugan play fullback differently and now the team will have to re-adjust whenever Dugan switches back, which affects continuity again.
I agree with you in principle, but I just don't think Dugan as fullback is really a good thing for an NRL side unless it has a couple of second rowers who can play before the line. I don't think he should be your fullback, and this isn't based on thinking Quinlan is the second coming.
He looks good individually but the demands of fullback in a backline shift these days are such that he's detrimental to the overall structure of any side with a conventional modern structure. Quinlan is less individually impressive in almost every area but he's a net positive to how well the side functions as a whole, especially when you get the added benefit of Dugan in the centres.
The fact we?ve spent the last couple of weeks debating Quinlan/Dugan simply means the answer is not simple. Even Mary probably doesn?t even know what?s best for the team.
Quinlan is by no means an elite player, in fact I?d go so far to say he?s a fringe first grader at best with loads of potential. The issue boils down to the fact that we have no one in the current team has bedded down the right centre spot. Farrell before he got injured showed very little, Runciman and Mata?utia are decent players, but again haven?t really set the world on fire.
At the same time, Dugan was moved to centre (for Origins sake) and had 2 great games playing centre. He?s also played well while playing centre at the Dragons and we have been winning. Quinlan hasn?t been great and has made mistakes but the fact remains we?re winning games, hence its confused the situation further.
End of the day, if Farrell, Runciman or Mata?utia had been having good seasons, we wouldn?t be having this debate. Dugan would be FB and one of the 3 would be right centre. And Quinlan would be a utility on the bench if he?s lucky.
As I said, it?s a tough one, and I?m happy for Mary to make the call. He?s done pretty well so far.
Not a bad vid GT, If he can play to that level consistently and rectify some small issues he's a keeper in my book. Honorable mention to that great shot of Nighty's running style right at the end :lol:
They know it's a lottery, but its better odds than risking a catch you can barely get to, or where you are at the disadvantage, especially when ur 5foot tall. That's what happened to quinlan, and his choice paid dividends too, yet he's copping it anyway on the forums.Very risky play yet so many players do it. THey think the ball is just going to bounce up and they can just take it or tackle the attacker coming through as soon as he catches the ball.
They know it's a lottery, but its better odds than risking a catch you can barely get to, or where you are at the disadvantage, especially when ur 5foot tall. That's what happened to quinlan, and his choice paid dividends too, yet he's copping it anyway on the forums.
Adam Quinlan? Good little player? Yep! Little livewire? Yep. First grade fullback? Nope.
What's the old adage? Don't weaken one position to strengthen another.
We need a fullback who does the following things well:
1. Bravely challenges the high ball;
2. Bravely brings the ball back knowing he will be met by a wall of chasers and will probably get hammered;
3. Bravely put his body on the line defensively (did anyone see Josh Hoffman play for Brisbane on Friday night?)
Our current fullback does not have these attributes. It is time to pick either Dugan or Beale as fullback. Time for the Quinlan experiment to end.