What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Fitzy's league Sledge

Chief_Chujo

Bench
Messages
4,723
"I mean, a Sydney suburban slug-fest between two teams situated 25 kilometres apart was fine, and the skills of the likes of Nathan Cleary a wonder to behold, but after the international grandeur and wild flowing mercury of the Boks-Wallabies match, didn’t the NRL feel ever so slightly ... suburban and staccato."

Its hard to comprehend how much of wanker someone has to be to write this drivel.
 

baselinepanther

Juniors
Messages
925
not that he ever has

but this is proof definitive he has NFI about what the average modern day aussie wants on his telle as sporting entertainment

it has never been yawnion
it will never be yawnion

he & most toffballers struggle with this reality.
 

Foreign Legion

First Grade
Messages
9,649
Who is the Fitzsimons bloke this thread is about? Anyone important?
wtf-wtf-tom-delonge.gif
 

baselinepanther

Juniors
Messages
925

flippikat

Bench
Messages
2,793
Omg I agree with the idiot

In some cases, dropping the name was ridiculous - like ACT Brumbies dropping ACT.... but for the teams over here in New Zealand, the geographical names for Super Rugby teams were inadequate - the "Auckland Blues" region currently includes Northland, the "Canterbury Crusaders" region includes Tasman (Nelsin/Malborough), Mid Canterbury, South Canterbury, West Coast & Buller.. and the "Wellington Hurricanes" region includes (deep breath) Wellington, Horowhenua-Kapiti, Wairarapa-Bush, Hawkes Bay, Manawatu & Wanganui.

You just can't easily come up with a geographical identifier for the NZ Super Rugby regions, because those identifiers JUST DON'T EXIST - unless you want to rattle off all the provinces that compose those regions.
 
Top