$2.7b for a renovation.
Someone's pocket is getting lined
$2.7b for a renovation.
Someone's pocket is getting lined
I'm sure the Sharks would love to play it at the Roosters home ground. They earned the home final, let them play it where they want.
At the Gabba? Why bother when there’s already a 50K capacity dedicated rectangular stadium just up the road? Any rectangular mode in a stadium also built to accommodate cricket and AFL id always going to be inferior to a dedicated stadium because of the inevitable distance from the pitch most of the stands will be at. Having separate good quality ovals and rectangles in a city is always going to be the best outcome.
For the money they are spending why not have a rectangular mode
It’s a stupid idea. It would be at Parra if we had to move it. Or would be at SFS if it wasn’t the Roosters
In my previous post, I argued for 20k minimum, but 25k is fine as well. There certainly needs to be a blanket rule or criteria in place for a venue to host a finals game.Oh please we become a joke of a sport when we make spineless decisions like this.
There should be a blanket rule that if you make the finals, no game can be played at a venue with less capacity then say 25K.
That way every team knows the score from the start and it takes away all these sh*ty grounds as an option. The home team can chose where they want to play as long as the venue hold 25K or more.
The current system isn't even a rule. The NRL under the existing rules can order any club to play at any venue it wants, but is to gutless to do it.
Fancy a semi being played in front of 13500 fans again at that sh*t hole of a park again. Who the Hell besides the Sharks thinks locking out 20K fans at this point of the season is a good idea? My God!!
Thats because in many cases their clubs pay for it, at least in Europe, not the tax payer. Mind helps if your club is earning $800mill a year!I've been following the re-build of the Bernabeau (80 000 capacity) for 3 years and it truly is amazing.
Barcelona have started a similar rebuild and will be increasing their capacity from 100 000 to 102 000.
Overseas countries make us and our stadiums look like amateurs.
Thats because in many cases their clubs pay for it, at least in Europe, not the tax payer. Mind helps if your club is earning $800mill a year!
It is impressive, love the architecture.I've been following the re-build of the Bernabeau (80 000 capacity) for 3 years and it truly is amazing.
Barcelona have started a similar rebuild and will be increasing their capacity from 100 000 to 102 000.
Overseas countries make us and our stadiums look like amateurs.
It is impressive, love the architecture.
Roof, are they afraid of rain, don't they play soccer in snow. I mean cricket they come off...anyways I would watch just about anything there.
Given the ordinary crowds in the gong I wouldn’t see that happening anyway
looks like the dragons aren’t moving to the gong full time anytime soon
Imagine if the new 112,000 seat La Bombonera becomes a thing!I've been following the re-build of the Bernabeau (80 000 capacity) for 3 years and it truly is amazing.
Barcelona have started a similar rebuild and will be increasing their capacity from 100 000 to 102 000.
Overseas countries make us and our stadiums look like amateurs.
I've been following the re-build of the Bernabeau (80 000 capacity) for 3 years and it truly is amazing.
Barcelona have started a similar rebuild and will be increasing their capacity from 100 000 to 102 000.
Overseas countries make us and our stadiums look like amateurs.
Not sure why they needed the roof. Madrid has a third of Sydney's annual average rainfall. It does snow there though, but not very often.
View attachment 78991
looks like the dragons aren’t moving to the gong full time anytime soon
I want one in Brisbane for originImagine if the new 112,000 seat La Bombonera becomes a thing!
View attachment 78998