Colonel Eel said:
Hmmmmmm..... funny story.
I thought Morris was the hooker and wait he's only quite young still and hang on, blow me down, Thorman and Hopkins can play hooker as well.
Damn Brian must be stupid to not try and stockpile hookers on the reserve grade bench when we have so much depth at hooker and in the backrow. I reckon we should get rid of Armit, Tim Smith and Ryan Hinchcliffe so we can sign Wade! It just makes much more sense.
Damn I am so enraged that he didn't do it.
But, hang on a sec...... who said Brian made the decision anyway? Who's not to say the club offered hm good dollars to stay and he said no.... :shock:
If you are concerned about junior talent then get behind the club and get them to sign the young blokes in the U 15's who nurtured right will be the blokes playing firsts when Hindy, Burt, Cayless and co are getting long in the tooth.
Wade and Sean didn't go on and do anything exciting after so much promise as juniors what makes Heath any different?
I thought Morris was the hooker and wait he's only quite young still and hang on, blow me down, Thorman and Hopkins can play hooker as well.
There's no guarentee that Morris is our answer to the hooking spot??....he did well for us this season when there but?? he also doen well for us at 5/8...actually better.
Thorman is more a 5/8 & half who i don't think has played any hooker at all for London fron the games i've seen of him & besides i have my doubts as to whether Thorman skills would not be utilised at hooker.....Thorman should be our first choice kicker..so kicking from dummy half all the time won't be a benefit to our side!!. Hopkins could be the answer but he still needs more time in that position to prove himself consistent.
Damn Brian must be stupid to not try and stockpile hookers on the reserve grade bench when we have so much depth at hooker and in the backrow. I reckon we should get rid of Armit, Tim Smith and Ryan Hinchcliffe so we can sign Wade! It just makes much more sense.
Damn I am so enraged that he didn't do it.
We don't have a stock pile of quality hookers.....just players who have recently been put there to cover the position!!......James Webster is hardly depth!!!
Why would we need to get rid of Armit, Smith, Hinchcliffe when we have just released the likes of Solomona, Heckenberg etc.....we did offer Nathan Blacklock a contract recently to the value of $220,000 (indicitive),
I'd be so enraged to letting Junior representitive players go and keeping the likes of Webster.
But, hang on a sec...... who said Brian made the decision anyway? Who's not to say the club offered hm good dollars to stay and he said no.... :shock:
Maybe your right??......maybe he was offered a contract to stay??.....A good contract??.....i doubt it!!
If you are concerned about junior talent then get behind the club and get them to sign the young blokes in the U 15's who nurtured right will be the blokes playing firsts when Hindy, Burt, Cayless and co are getting long in the tooth.
Wade and Sean didn't go on and do anything exciting after so much promise as juniors what makes Heath any different
Alot of youngsters are know place on Schlorships at 15.....i know a few youngsters playing Flegg for the Raiders this year & they have been on Scholarships since they where 15!!
Wade & Sean where good players.......they where hardly given the chance to prove themselves!....Did Sean even get a crack at Fisrt Grade???.......they must be obviously a very talented family.....just like the Witt boys!!
