- Messages
- 62,358
I didn't say he was a dud, but some people in here are undervaluing what Gibbs brings to our team.Where does it specifically say that Blair is coming to play prop? Have I missed something? And even if he does, he regularly plays prop for NZ. That is good enough for me.
There is no way Adam Blair is equally or only marginally better than Bryce Gibbs. He is one of the best forwards in the world, and is NZ's vice captain. Gibbs is a solid first grader and admittedly a very good defender but he is nowhere near the class of Blair.
We are not signing a dud here, he is a quality player. I remember the same questions being asked when we signed Ellis and Tuqiri: "Too much money, why are we paying a winger so much, Ellis is unproven in the NRL, we should sign someone better" etc. etc. Look how they both turned out. I suspect the same will happen with Blair. Can't believe anyone would be against his signing!
Why buy him as a backrower when we already have Ellis, Dwyer and Heighington. Of course he's coming to be a prop. We've got no else able to fill in at prop without forcing someone to play out of position.
It's dumb. Why sell TWO props who are good quality and improving to buy ONE prop, I dodn't care how good he is, he cannot do the work of the two men he's replaced.
Sell Gibbs if you want to buy a reliable halfback or fullback, that I can handle.
This though, its just dumb.
Here, I'll give you one big apple for your two medium sized apples. It's just dumb.