I Have An Idea For Finals Football; It's Controversial, But I Reckon It Would Be Great; Help Wanted!

Discussion in 'Parramatta Eels' started by Eelementary, Aug 11, 2019.

  1. Gary Gutful

    Gary Gutful Immortal

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    30,922
    Likes Received:
    8,739
    I'm with this merkin.
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  2. T.S Quint

    T.S Quint First Grade

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    9,539
    Likes Received:
    3,312
    I believe it was that the top two teams at the end of the year played off in a Final. If the team that finished minor premiers lost that Final then they would have a ‘right of reply’ to force a Grand Final, the winner of which would be the Premiers.

    Maybe @madunit could help us out if he doesn’t mind.
     
    Eelementary and emjaycee like this.
  3. emjaycee

    emjaycee First Grade

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    8,732
    Likes Received:
    3,466
    What the squinty guy said.
     
  4. Gary Gutful

    Gary Gutful Immortal

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    30,922
    Likes Received:
    8,739
  5. 84 Baby

    84 Baby Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    13,854
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    There’s only one true finals system

     
  6. chiefy1

    chiefy1 Juniors

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2017
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    508
    Won't happen. More games equals revenue. Fox and nine wont stand for less games.
    The minor premiers get enough advantage with two home finals ie storm
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  7. hindy111

    hindy111 Referee

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    28,937
    Likes Received:
    5,936
    I think finish in top 4 is a reward as get 2nd chance. Finish 1st or 2nd and you get hom game. It's a good system currently.
    The comp is that even a few injuries could have you finish in 3rd not 1st.

    I would be open to positions 7 and 8 being wild cards. Or atleast position 8.
    Always thought it should go to the team with best differential of all teams left that finished 8-16
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  8. Joshuatheeel

    Joshuatheeel Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    15,554
    Likes Received:
    3,478
    The old system of 1 v 8 etc etc was more benefit to minor premiers than the current system.

    Current set up, minor premiers have to play a fairly tough / very losable game against 4th.

    The old system they got to play 8th which basically guaranteed a win / week off (yes they lost a few times)

    However I have no stats which set up, the MP lost the most games in week 1.
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  9. strider

    strider Post Whore

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2003
    Messages:
    61,894
    Likes Received:
    8,457
    Current system, 1st and 2nd are guaranteed 2 home finals which is substantial, especially for non sydney teams, but also sydney teams wont have to travel interstate
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  10. T.S Quint

    T.S Quint First Grade

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    9,539
    Likes Received:
    3,312
    As it stands there isn’t much difference between finishing 1st or 2nd besides a cash prize.
    2nd place still gets a second chance, still gets a home Final first week and also has to play a top 4 team. Depending on the year the difference between having to play 3rd or 4th might be quite a bit, but most years there wouldn’t be much difference.
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  11. 84 Baby

    84 Baby Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    13,854
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    IIRC 8th won twice (us 09 and Warriors 08). I agree the change helped 3rd/4th but did so somewhat at the expense of the MPs.

    Also the home games through the finals really disproportionately helps interstate teams, especially given Sydney teams aren’t afforded same benefit for most part.

    I’m all for a conference system. Perhaps 2 8-team conferences, top 4 each conference play round robin, winner plays GF
     
  12. parrathruandthru

    parrathruandthru Juniors

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    621
    Never understood why the NRL didn't go with Warren Ryan's system. Gives them an extra game for revenue

    WEEK ONE
    Friday night: top-ranked team (1) v fourth-ranked team (4)
    Saturday afternoon: 6 v 7
    Saturday night: 2 v 3
    Sunday afternoon: 5 v 8
    - lowest-ranked loser eliminated, highest-ranked winner advances to week three

    WEEK TWO (three games instead of two)
    Saturday afternoon: lowest-ranked loser of top four teams v highest-ranked winner of bottom four teams
    Saturday night: highest-ranked loser of top four teams v lowest-ranked winner of bottom four teams
    Sunday afternoon: remaining winner from top four teams v remaining winner of bottom four teams

    WEEK THREE
    Saturday night: highest-ranked winner from week one v lowest-ranked winner from week two
    Sunday afternoon: highest-ranked winner from week two v second highest-ranked winner from week two

    WEEK FOUR (grand final)
    two winners from week three
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  13. Joshuatheeel

    Joshuatheeel Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    15,554
    Likes Received:
    3,478
    I reckon the problem with that system is 2 v 3 are almost playing for nothing.

    It’s a tough game (potentially tougher then a 6v7 game), they bash each other then probably have to play the following week.
     
  14. Noise

    Noise Coach

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,770
    Likes Received:
    3,648
    If we are going to continue with a top 8 then I actually like the current system. I would like it even more if we featured in it a bit more regularly
     
    Kornstar likes this.
  15. TheRam

    TheRam First Grade

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,033
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Now that's some inspired high calibre thinking right there. Love it!
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  16. TheRam

    TheRam First Grade

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,033
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    If you still have 7 teams playing off to see who joins the Minor premiers in the GF, can you imagine how non match fit the MP's will be by the end of the month of the finals. No MP would ever win the GF. Teams would be tripping over themselves to second or worse.
     
    Eelementary likes this.
  17. 84 Baby

    84 Baby Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    13,854
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    A 16 team finals series with the top 15 NRL teams and a 16th team who is winner of a national lower grade, team nominative style tournament. Imagine cheering on the Group 11 Nyngan Tigers reserve grade!

    Actually f**k those guys! I hope we f**ken smash them!
     
  18. madunit

    madunit Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    62,286
    Likes Received:
    1,798
    There's been several finals systems in place over the years.

    1908-09 used a system whereby you still accumulated premiership points in the finals.

    In 1908, first played third in a knockout semi-final, and second played fourth in a knockout semi. The winners then played in a Final, and the team which was ahead on points (after adding finals wins to their regular season tally) was declared the winner. If both teams were even on points, a second final would be played.

    Because both Easts and Souths were theoretically even on 20 points heading into the Final, South Sydney's win took them to 22 points, making them the winner.

    1910-11 worked off a similar system, except that it contained only the top 2 teams. The game ended in a draw, which meant Newtown, who went into the game one point clear on the ladder, was declared Premiers.

    1911 saw Glebe finish in first, but Easts and Souths were tied for second - they played in a play-off to determine who would face Glebe (no comp points were awarded for this game). Easts beat Glebe in the final which meant both sides were now even on comp Pts, necessitating a Grand Final, which Easts won.

    1912-1925 & 1937 - First past the post - If you were alone on comp pts at the end of the regular season, you were the Premier - no finals played unless there was a tie for first place.

    1926-1936 & 1938-1955 - Grand Final Challenge system - 4 team finals series. If the minor premier lost at any point in the series they had the right to challenge the team who won the final in a Grand Final. This system came under scrutiny in 1944 when it was alleged that Minor Premiers Newtown threw the final against Balmain to ensure a second lot of gate takings. Balmain though won the Grand Final.

    In 1956-1973 - 4 team finals series. No Grand Final Challenge
    1974-1994 - 5 team finals series
    1995-96 - 8 team finals series
    1997 - 7 team finals series (ARL), 5 team finals series (SL)
    1998 - 10 team finals series
    1999-2019 - 8 team finals series.
     
    Kornstar, T.S Quint and Twizzle like this.
  19. T.S Quint

    T.S Quint First Grade

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    9,539
    Likes Received:
    3,312
    Thanks for that info mate.
    Much appreciated :thumbsup:
     
  20. 84 Baby

    84 Baby Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    13,854
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    After all that I think the best system would be a 16 team challenge finals series. One with Scum as MPs and #CAM900 has to play every game
     

Share This Page