What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

In defence of...

1eyedeel

Juniors
Messages
552
I studied the replay pretty closely tonight and I want to defend both Pearson and Wagon who both got slammed by some for their performance.

Pearson easily made more hit-ups and metres than any other Eel. He came up with a fair metreage per hit-up stat in a side where he didn't have a lot of support and he continually slipped nice offloads that resulted in second phase play. He was solid in defence and actually managed to stop the attack fairly abruptly when he was involved in the tackle. I thought he was Parra's best.

Wagon made more than 40 tackles and I thought his running was the most effective its been all year. He cracked the Warriors twice and the pass he slipped to put Hopkins over was a dead set pearler and should no way have been called forward.

In fact, there weren't too many really poor individual performances in the squad and I really can't fault the effort. They just lacked team cohesion and that comes down to missing Dykes and neither Thorman or Witt being able to step up.
 

True EEL

Bench
Messages
4,857
can't agree about Pearson....he may have made some hit-ups and metres, but plenty of backs did the same and watching him trying to play pivot and passing the ball just as he got to the ruck made me want to vomit

i never questioned Wagon's committment or effort
 

oldmancraigy

Coach
Messages
11,995
I totally agree about Pearson - TrueEEL I suggest you watch the replay! Pearson made over 140 meters in the match!! He was our only guy who went forward.

Disagree about Wagon - he didn't run the ball well - but I agree that his pass to Hopkins was certainly backwards - that hurt us a little....
 
Top