Misty Bee
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,082
I noticed one extroadinary thing late Friday night.
When Perry scored, Brad Thorn gave him a hug and a big grin like it was little brother getting his first sexual encounter. Civo was likewise.
Broncos never smile! The only smile I have seen from a Bronco in recent years was Webcke after the Grand Final, realising he doesn't have to put up with Wayne Bennets whinging ever again. But on Friday it was great to see - was it relief on their faces? Brisbane to a man played well, and despite what the loss meant, they seemed to be relieved and happy with the effort.
I'm guessing that without having to spoon feed Lockyer, some of the younger players have more freedom to shine themselves. I recall about 6 weeks ago, a young Bronco halfback was on debut (name eludes me). Wayne Bennet admitted instructing him just to feed Lockyer, not to do anything himself. Heck, the player could have been the next Sterlo, but Bennet made it clear that any individualism would be frowned upon regardless of the result.
I'm not a fan of the Lockyer/Thurston combination, as they don't combine at all well in general play. They individually dominate one side of the ruck, and rarely work togethher in creativity. Scott Prince had the same problem, and it drove Brett Syemour to drink.
Brisbane seemed to have a licence to individually cut loose on Friday.
There is no duobting Lockyer is their biggest assett, but is the whole need to feed him negating from talents elsewhere in the side?
When Perry scored, Brad Thorn gave him a hug and a big grin like it was little brother getting his first sexual encounter. Civo was likewise.
Broncos never smile! The only smile I have seen from a Bronco in recent years was Webcke after the Grand Final, realising he doesn't have to put up with Wayne Bennets whinging ever again. But on Friday it was great to see - was it relief on their faces? Brisbane to a man played well, and despite what the loss meant, they seemed to be relieved and happy with the effort.
I'm guessing that without having to spoon feed Lockyer, some of the younger players have more freedom to shine themselves. I recall about 6 weeks ago, a young Bronco halfback was on debut (name eludes me). Wayne Bennet admitted instructing him just to feed Lockyer, not to do anything himself. Heck, the player could have been the next Sterlo, but Bennet made it clear that any individualism would be frowned upon regardless of the result.
I'm not a fan of the Lockyer/Thurston combination, as they don't combine at all well in general play. They individually dominate one side of the ruck, and rarely work togethher in creativity. Scott Prince had the same problem, and it drove Brett Syemour to drink.
Brisbane seemed to have a licence to individually cut loose on Friday.
There is no duobting Lockyer is their biggest assett, but is the whole need to feed him negating from talents elsewhere in the side?