What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

News Jarryd Hayne sexual assault trials

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,382
I would say the more unhinged and unbelievable component of this is seeing three juries be presented with the evidence and none of them felt the evidence showed he was innocent and yet, you, with all your f**king wisdom go on believing 3 juries and 36 people with all the info got it wrong but you know the truth

that’s as unreasonable, unhinged and unbelievable as it gets.
 

fourplay

Juniors
Messages
2,236
I would say the more unhinged and unbelievable component of this is seeing three juries be presented with the evidence and none of them felt the evidence showed he was innocent and yet, you, with all your f**king wisdom go on believing 3 juries and 36 people with all the info got it wrong but you know the truth

that’s as unreasonable, unhinged and unbelievable as it gets.

Go on, tell us more about these individual jury members who formed opinions "regardless of the evidence". You seemed to imply that you know them and their motives really well since you even compared them to me. Be sure to refer to a jury member or myself as a "he-man" again for bonus points.


Happy Big Brother GIF by MOODMAN
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,382
All I know about them is they were on the wrong side of this legal verdict
As are you.

As for why they were on that side, and unable to be persuaded to agree with the vast majority of their peers, I can only speculate

my speculation is they’re likely unreasonable he-man pieces of shit, like you. Our jury system can’t eliminate all you from the jury pool but thankfully have processes in place so a vast majority of people applying common sense are able to override 1-2 rouge jurists and deliver justice.
 

fourplay

Juniors
Messages
2,236
my speculation is they’re likely unreasonable he-man pieces of shit, like you.

Amazing. Speculating that individual jury members who came to a conclusion you don't like, after sitting through weeks of evidence and testimony that you were not privy to, must be "unreasonable he-men", because that is clearly the only logical conclusion, right? 😂😂

While we are speculating, I can speculate on the type of man who would refer to other men as "he-men" and I bet they'd be the type of man who is very equated with the term "incel". Probably has tens of thousands of posts across multiple forums too. ;)
 

King hit

Coach
Messages
14,063
Hayne is a wanker of a person but wiping his name from the records is George Orwell level stuff. Imagine if you had to write off anything with something attached to it. There would be no Hollywood movies for a start (Weinstein and everyone condoning it)

They haven’t ever spoken about scrubbing Carney 2010 or Barba 2012 for example.
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,382
Amazing. Speculating that individual jury members who came to a conclusion you don't like, after sitting through weeks of evidence and testimony that you were not privy to, must be "unreasonable he-men", because that is clearly the only logical conclusion, right? 😂😂

While we are speculating, I can speculate on the type of man who would refer to other men as "he-men" and I bet they'd be the type of man who is very equated with the term "incel". Probably has tens of thousands of posts across multiple forums too. ;)
Speculate away. I care little for what faceless user names on the internet think of me and even less when they are users who are staunch defenders of convicted sex offenders.
That’s your cross to bear, my guy.
 

soc123_au

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
19,840
Amazing. Speculating that individual jury members who came to a conclusion you don't like, after sitting through weeks of evidence and testimony that you were not privy to, must be "unreasonable he-men", because that is clearly the only logical conclusion, right? 😂😂

While we are speculating, I can speculate on the type of man who would refer to other men as "he-men" and I bet they'd be the type of man who is very equated with the term "incel". Probably has tens of thousands of posts across multiple forums too. ;)
Tell us you dont know what an incel is without telling us you dont know what an incel is.
 

soc123_au

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
19,840
Hayne is a wanker of a person but wiping his name from the records is George Orwell level stuff. Imagine if you had to write off anything with something attached to it. There would be no Hollywood movies for a start (Weinstein and everyone condoning it)

They haven’t ever spoken about scrubbing Carney 2010 or Barba 2012 for example.
Yeah, that shit is pretty dumb. Revising history should be a big no no, stripping accolades for cheating aside.
 
Messages
11,707
So what if the jurors who sat through mountains of evidence, which you did not, are STILL walking around today believing that he is not guilty? Do you think you know more than them?
Those 2 people from the first trial... compared to the 34 people on the juries from that and the other two trials? Yeah, I'll side with the 34 and believe I know more than the two "true believers" thanks.
A great burst of insight. Still waiting for the crayon eater to reach the same conclusion.
You left out the bit where individuals are also entitled to be criticised for their opinion to give benefit of the doubt - just like you appear to be criticising people who's opinion is not to grant twice-convicted Hayne any doubt?
 
Messages
11,707
It's a new trial so he could easily get a bigger sentence this time.

I read on line Hayne hasn't got alot of money left, so it's a huge fall from grace, If he could catch a punt in the NFL he'd be worth 10s of millions.
True. I still remember those games in his NFL dream where it ended up he couldn't catch a ball...

And some of Hayne's money of course had to go to settling the civil claim against him for similar secual behaviour in the United States from his NFL "big dog's gotta eat" days.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,016
Hayne is a wanker of a person but wiping his name from the records is George Orwell level stuff. Imagine if you had to write off anything with something attached to it. There would be no Hollywood movies for a start (Weinstein and everyone condoning it)

They haven’t ever spoken about scrubbing Carney 2010 or Barba 2012 for example.

I’d be happy enough for any other convicted rapists in our game’s history to also be stripped of any awards.

seems an easy enough line to draw.

I wouldn’t go retroactively awarding the medal to the next highest polling player that year though. Just keep Hayne as the award winner with a little asterisk that says *revoked due to rape conviction
 

King hit

Coach
Messages
14,063
I’d be happy enough for any other convicted rapists in our game’s history to also be stripped of any awards.

seems an easy enough line to draw.

I wouldn’t go retroactively awarding the medal to the next highest polling player that year though. Just keep Hayne as the award winner with a little asterisk that says *revoked due to rape conviction
Imagine if Wally Lewis was convicted of rape does that mean an entire decade of the game is wiped from history
 
Messages
11,283
True. I still remember those games in his NFL dream where it ended up he couldn't catch a ball...

And some of Hayne's money of course had to go to settling the civil claim against him for similar secual behaviour in the United States from his NFL "big dog's gotta eat" days.

He blew it. Embarrassed himself and the country in prime time. Coach even took a chance on him, could have opened the door for other players potentially switching.

 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,382
I’d be happy enough for any other convicted rapists in our game’s history to also be stripped of any awards.

seems an easy enough line to draw.

I wouldn’t go retroactively awarding the medal to the next highest polling player that year though. Just keep Hayne as the award winner with a little asterisk that says *revoked due to rape conviction
I don’t mind that
Keep the name in the history book, add the context of the what a scumbag he was.
 

Latest posts

Top