Crush
I am merely trying to be objective re the case you presented.
Do you think an injury inflicted by illegal play counts for a player being injury prone?
If you do then I don't agree with that belief and if you don't you need to recalibrate Dugan's stats accordingly.
The article you are quoting is old, unfortunately has some obvious flaws and not completely accurate by its own admission.
PS: I hate Dugan rolling around on the ground carrying on and I think it detracts from him but I also believe he is a tough bastard and could have gone off on several occasions but stayed on and toughed it out.
OT, lets agree to disagree on this one. I believe that dugan is injury prone and you do not. Leave it at that mate.Crush
I am merely trying to be objective re the case you presented.
Do you think an injury inflicted by illegal play counts for a player being injury prone?
If you do then I don't agree with that belief and if you don't you need to recalibrate Dugan's stats accordingly.
The article you are quoting is old, unfortunately has some obvious flaws and not completely accurate by its own admission.
PS: I hate Dugan rolling around on the ground carrying on and I think it detracts from him but I also believe he is a tough bastard and could have gone off on several occasions but stayed on and toughed it out.
I doubt any of us really know the salary cap situation, but if Melbourne can keep Cronk, Smith and Slater on the books, surely we can keep Hunt, McInnes and Duges, as well as retaining Field, Dufty and Mann.
Just becomes a question of the right price. IMO, his current asking price (or equivalent under the new cap) is fair. As Priddle's says, a pay cut is an insult.
As for Dufty and Field - I'm not at all saying that juniors are obselete if they have established players in front of them. But we need to pan the pathways over a number of years (I'm obviously quite vocal about these kids needing time in Cutters before hitting firsts). It won't be until next year that these guys can handle a full 26 rounds in NRL, another year or two before they start thriving and then another couple of years before they have a real breakout. If we plan for that and communicate it to them, we won't have any issues with the guys in front of them. Yep, they ooze potential (although I still think Herbert and Host are our juniors most likely to achieve stardom) but it's likely that they won't fully consistently realise that potential in NRL for another 3-5 years. Meanwhile, would be handy to have an outside back of Digans calibre around!
Injury prone or not bottom line is Duges worth the money he is asking ? What is he worth to the team ? Are we any better with him playing his style of footy . Do we win more games when he plays ? Are we better off with another fullback that is on the same money that plays a different style ? IMO if we are going to pay Duges what he wants or buy another fullback or even use Duges as a center NONE OF THIS MATTERS IF MARY IS STILL COACH nothing will change the results will be the same . Need a clean out Doust , Mary ,Young ,Young JR, Hornby . Need a injection of something new , not the same old same old . So is anyone worth the money their on playing Dragons footy ? The point is we can pay top dollar or even play the whole Cutters side in first grade and we will get the same result .
Dugan is not only injury prone he is also a thug.Fancy attacking poor GI's shoulder with his jaw. As for laying down after being tackled i believe this is upon instruction from McWrecker to get our time in possession stats looking better
Surprised you've heard of the f**ker!
All TPA's should be managed by the NRL in a manner that does not favour any NRL Club.Lewish33 , there are so many problems which have plagued this club over the last few years , however they all stem from the clubs inefficient board . The clubs that you have mentioned all have a history of being able to find money when they really need it . (?)
Nor are our clubs TPA,s on par with most other clubs and more unfortunately our leagues club is not able to inject as much capital into the football clubs coffers as it once did . Still I am sure that the Dragons can accommodate Duges if his price is not too high .
I certainly do not want him in another teams colours , as I like most would hope that some sort of compromise may yet be reached . Who really knows the correct asking price ? At this point it's all conjecture .
However , as I said in a post earlier this year , I just found it somewhat odd that he gave the Dragons a time limit for negotiations . To me that meant that he may have had a couple of irons in the fire .
There is another aspect to this also , and that is Hasler wanted Dugan at the Bulldogs when his stink with Brisbane first came up . However he chose the Dragons , I just hope that if there is any truth whatsoever to the Dessie rumour that , should , Dugan leave that will not upset any plans that he , Hasler , may have had for the Dragons ? Merely a thought , something to dwell upon .
All TPA's should be managed by the NRL in a manner that does not favour any NRL Club.
NRL Marketing Officers search the market for businesses who want to gain exposure through NRL elite players. The TPA is for a the player, is for a set period of time and travels with him to any Club. In this way the NRL is able to keep elite players within the NRL and Clubs would have nothing to do with TPAs. Under this policy, the salary cap would rule again and the ability to cheat would be diminished significantly.How on earth would that work? If a business wants to invest money in a player it shouldn't be dictated to them by the NRL which player they can employ. That sort of strategy would drive corporate $$$ away from the game.
Well putIn my opinion, Milne would be just as effective at right centre, so let Dugan go. Let Widdop go and allow Mann and Field to fight for the 6 jumper.
Dufty may very well be our Tedesco and Mann or Field be the perfect patner for Hunt.
Of course it goes without saying, we need a new top line coach.
NRL Marketing Officers search the market for businesses who want to gain exposure through NRL elite players. The TPA is for a the player, is for a set period of time and travels with him to any Club. In this way the NRL is able to keep elite players within the NRL and Clubs would have nothing to do with TPAs. Under this policy, the salary cap would rule again and the ability to cheat would be diminished significantly.
Gareth totally agree , but our club have been left behind in every aspect , and if most are getting away with it then where dose that leave us , not very smart operators running the ship .....Without straying too far from the thread topic , I understand what both Bring In The Noise and yourself Possum are saying . However , Possums suggestion does have merit , admittedly it is not the way that the corporate sector would prefer it , however there is no doubt that something does need to be done to ' even the playing field ' , so as there is no advantage to the richer clubs .
We are all aware that many clubs are better run , than others and that being the case they should not be penalised for their efficiency . However anything that will prevent clubs from not being honest and upfront about their business dealings , will only help the game itself in the long run . There must be some way of doing so , but most importantly
under the watchful eye of the NRL itself . There have been far too many clubs over the last 10-15 years that decided the best way of obtaining that premiership trophy was to cheat the system , far too many .
NRL Marketing Officers search the market for businesses who want to gain exposure through NRL elite players. The TPA is for a the player, is for a set period of time and travels with him to any Club. In this way the NRL is able to keep elite players within the NRL and Clubs would have nothing to do with TPAs. Under this policy, the salary cap would rule again and the ability to cheat would be diminished significantly.
Gareth totally agree , but our club have been left behind in every aspect , and if most are getting away with it then where dose that leave us , not very smart operators running the ship .....
Under TPA's Clubs are not supposed to be involved.All well and good in theory but in practice it is complete rubbish.
A Brisbane based business is only going to want to sponsor Brisbane based players. Are the NRL supposed to say no because they are attracting more TPA sponsorship than other clubs? That would equal a restraint of trade for players who already have their earning capacity capped enough as it is.
It's simply on club administrations to do better with regards to TPA sponsorship rather than pass the buck onto some half assed centralised sponsorship program that will inevitably drive corporate dollars away.
Under TPA's Clubs are not supposed to be involved.
It is very short sighted to identify a local sponsor wanting to sponsor a local player. Players often move from club to club these days.
A national brand sponsoring an elite player is where TPAs should be heading and the NRL are the most appropriate entity to manage this.
If the NRL were managing TPAs, it is most likely some of our elite players would not have been lost to rugby union and other codes.
National brands have the marketing budget and the willingness to buy exposure to a well televised national / international game. The ability to use players in their marketing programs would be great value for money if the NRL marketed the TPA program properly.