Gareth67
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,508
Always occurs to one of the struggling teams of the competition - our problem is that we came to close to having a semi berth and a successful season .Another one of the many injustices of the world.
Always occurs to one of the struggling teams of the competition - our problem is that we came to close to having a semi berth and a successful season .Another one of the many injustices of the world.
Let's f**k St George good and proper, our season ended against the Bullcheats everyway but loose, this is like 1998 repeating itself again, gameday + plus extras, let's really make the supporter base eat shit!Always occurs to one of the struggling teams of the competition - our problem is that we came to close to having a semi berth and a successful season .
What for so the whole team gets suspended for 2000 years, by the evil empire?Crichton is a weak gutted dog. I hope the Dragons give him some very special treatment the next time we play those scum bags.
Well we should send a terse message back to those bent bastards on the judiciary panel, especially Henry (there's a hole in the bucket) Perenara and tell them to all get nicked.I thought the players on sidelines in origin were harshly done by getting 2 weeks for entering melee.. they said they had to "send message out it was unnaceptable" ..
You just knew they would say they have to send the message out a bite is unnacepptable regardless of circumstances or evidence Flanno gave..
He was always going to get banned. Shouldn't have but was always going to happen. Meanwhile the cretin who instigated it doesn't even get a slap on the wrist for what I'd call a fairly clear example of contrary conduct.I was following the case on SMH. Appeared to me that a reasonable case was put forward. The thing that gets me with the NRL judiciary is it is unlike a court where facts of law are presented and expert opinions presented and witnesses are grilled. A decision is then made based on what was presented at the case, not what reported in the media, not what you think but based on “the evidence presented”. The fact that Crichton wasn’t at the hearing, no formal complaint made, etc.. it beggars belief that the process is fair.