Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If we lift our risk threshold to high in an attempt to buy (rather than build) our way to a premiership then all bets are off. We cannot possibly be in control of all of the long term impacts to our club.
I think we’re doing both. We are now building a team through our junior pathways and that has allowed us to spend more on genuine stars.
I actually think you really don't get my point at all. It is not any more of a short term solution than our current approach, which is to avoid finishing last.
That sounds like a low risk approach, not a high risk approach.
You are right. I'm probably not understanding your point. All good.
A low risk approach would be to stack the squad with average first graders to be able to field a decent team in the event of injuries.
Maximin. I think.
Exactly. Much like the Roosters. They go alright.
That's not high risk, it's how every club tries to do it.
So do what we are already doing? I agree.
We will never be able to do it as well as them until we unlock the same level of TPAs.
I disagree with your first sentence but agree with your second.
Yep, I think we’re definitely getting the balance much better than we have previously.
I'm more interested in the ones that don't show up on the graph.
By the way, I'm not sure that 'toy' was entirely appropriate but it would be rude of me not to use it.
George Soros has been propping up the Roosters for years from his pizza parlour in Atlantis. He sent down a alien lifeform that he called 'Nick Politis' to coordinate efforts on the ground.
