What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Michael Jennings

Wizardman

First Grade
Messages
8,941

https://www.espn.co.uk/nrl/story/_/...-6-league-celebrate-michael-jennings-game-300

NRL won't celebrate Michael Jennings' 300th game​


The NRL has decided not to honour Michael Jennings' 300-game milestone with traditional celebrations due to the Sydney Roosters centre's past off-field indiscretions.

AAP understands the NRL deliberated on the matter for weeks before formally notifying the Roosters of their decision on Monday morning.

In December 2021, the NSW District Court ordered Jennings to pay his ex-wife Kirra Wilden close to $500,000 after she accused the NRL player of raping her multiple times during their marriage.

Jennings denied the allegations, which were brought against him in a civil case and have not been subject to criminal trial.

AAP understands that case was not the sole reason for Jennings being denied celebrations ahead of his milestone match against Newcastle on Thursday, with a three-year drug ban also factoring in.

Jennings tested positive to performance-enhancing substances Ligandrol and Ibutamoren while playing in Parramatta's 2020 finals tilt, but was thrown an NRL lifeline by the Roosters in the most recent pre-season.

The NRL registered Jennings' train-and-trial contract and also approved his promotion to the Roosters' top-30 squad in March, clearing him for an unrestricted return to first grade.

Jennings played his 299th career game after being activated as 18th man in Friday's loss to Canterbury, but his 300th will pass without fanfare from the NRL.

"Due to past conduct, Michael Jennings will not receive official NRL recognition on his 300th match," the organisation's chief executive Andrew Abdo said in a statement to AAP.

Ordinarily, Abdo would present a player reaching their 300th appearance with the game ball before kick-off.

A media release is usually circulated in which league officials formally congratulate the player, and at the ground the 30-metre line is replaced with '300' as a nod to the individual's achievement.

Abdo is no certainty to attend McDonald Jones Stadium on Thursday night as Jennings becomes the 51st player to bring up the triple century.

The NRL will not stand in the Roosters' way if they wish to mark the milestone themselves.

The injury-hit Roosters are expected to name Jennings in their starting side when their team list is released on Tuesday afternoon.

James Tedesco (concussion), Billy Smith (leg) and Dom Young (suspension) will all be missing from the back-line, with Jennings and Fetalaiga Pauga set to be brought in as cover.

At the weekend, Roosters teammates argued Jennings' drug ban should not preclude him from formal celebrations of his 300th game.

Jennings pleaded guilty in 2021 to the doping offence to cut his suspension down from four years, but maintained he did not intentionally take banned substances.

In March last year, Jennings unsuccessfully appealed against the NSW District Court's ruling against him in the civil case brought by Wilden.

Lawyers for Wilden declined to comment when AAP contacted them regarding any payment plan set up by the NRL player.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,842
He's scum. The NRL is pathetic for registering his contract

this I agree with

Happy enough to let him be registered again though.

this I don't, he's either played 300 games or he hasn't

why the f**k would the NRL allow him to be re-registered only to ignore his achievements, the fact that they dont want to acknowledge says to me that they probably shouldn't have re-registered him

where is the logic here?
 

Vlad59

Bench
Messages
2,703
Interested to know on what basis they could have not registered him. I’d rather he wasn’t registered but I’m a bit confused as to how he could have been refused. As for the roosters. What were they thinking signing him in the first place?
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
31,974
Interested to know on what basis they could have not registered him. I’d rather he wasn’t registered but I’m a bit confused as to how he could have been refused. As for the roosters. What were they thinking signing him in the first place?

Seemed like a pointless NSW cup depth signing until half our backline decided to KO themselves
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
12,145
They re-registered him as they don’t have a legal basis to not register him if he wanted to kick up a stink.

Having Abdo decide not to hand him a $8 ball in a $15 plastic case is a lot simpler action for them to take.

Same as Folau then isn't if?

Just a captains call from the NRL.
 

Chimp

Bench
Messages
2,692
this I agree with



this I don't, he's either played 300 games or he hasn't

why the f**k would the NRL allow him to be re-registered only to ignore his achievements, the fact that they dont want to acknowledge says to me that they probably shouldn't have re-registered him

where is the logic here?
It’s reeks of the usual hypocrisy.

There’d be an arguement that he’s had his day in Court (both the personal stuff and the drugs), served his time, and therefore NRL have no right to decline him.

However, scratch beneath the surface and it doesn’t add up. It appears he’s not sorted out the compensation/payment ordered by the Court - if I remember rightly, Matt Lodge (another piece of sh*t) had to sort his payments out first before he could come back to the game, so there’s a hypocrisy… Then there’s Curtis Scott (another piece of sh*t) - he’s basically been told he’ll never get back to NRL, yet his crimes are far less than Jennings….

All that being said, for whatever reason, they’ve let him back, but I agree with their stance on not celebrating him or his achievement publicly - that would be lunacy.
 

Vlad59

Bench
Messages
2,703
It’s reeks of the usual hypocrisy.

There’d be an arguement that he’s had his day in Court (both the personal stuff and the drugs), served his time, and therefore NRL have no right to decline him.

However, scratch beneath the surface and it doesn’t add up. It appears he’s not sorted out the compensation/payment ordered by the Court - if I remember rightly, Matt Lodge (another piece of sh*t) had to sort his payments out first before he could come back to the game, so there’s a hypocrisy… Then there’s Curtis Scott (another piece of sh*t) - he’s basically been told he’ll never get back to NRL, yet his crimes are far less than Jennings….

All that being said, for whatever reason, they’ve let him back, but I agree with their stance on not celebrating him or his achievement publicly - that would be lunacy.
Scott was found guilty in a criminal court.
29]

On 7 October 2022, Scott was found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, common assault and stalk or intimidate with the intention of causing fear or physical harm.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,161
They re-registered him as they don’t have a legal basis to not register him if he wanted to kick up a stink.
Don't the NRL have sole discretion here?

I'd say it's more to do with the power and influence the Roosters have with the NRL.

I'd doubt a lesser club gets this one over the line.

For mine, he shouldn't be anywhere near the game, same as that piece of shit Lodge.
 

Vlad59

Bench
Messages
2,703
*Removed by Admin*
Jennings had not been found guilty of a criminal offence as far as I’m aware. Regardless of what we think I’m not sure what the nrl can do unless it brings in a good character clause and good luck with that
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,161
Jennings had not been found guilty of a criminal offence as far as I’m aware. Regardless of what we think I’m not sure what the nrl can do unless it brings in a good character clause and good luck with that
There is no way the NRL are "forced" to register someone. They have sole discretion here.

Look at Israel Folau.

They are just as complicit, in this decision, as the Roosters.
 
Top