My point is that people are allowed to criticise coaches, players, governments whatever but they shouldn't necessarily think that they know better than them.
Its very easy to criticise others. Its like people calling McGregor a drunk for going low range DUI. The same people probably spend most nights in a pub...
Crush
No good of criticising anything unless you have a better option in your own opinion and of course to do that you have to think you know more than them otherwise it is pointless to criticise.
For instance in here I try to give sound reasoning as to why I think like I do.
Some times in doing that the posts get long winded but I believe that is sometimes required due to the initial criticism.
Others come along and dismiss it in a sentence or two but often never give a valid reason IMO for their own criticism.
If someone doesn't vote in the election, then I think to some point they forego the right of criticism but if you exercise your democratic right and don't like what happens then you are entitled to criticise.
If you follow St GI and give devotion to that and you are not happy and you can see what you believe to be a better way, then you are perfectly entitled to criticise, exactly as those that believe in all things club are entitled to applaud it.
The difference comes in if you are able to clearly justify that position and unfortunately on both sides of all debates there are critics who never justify anything and just dismiss it for the sake of it.