You mean like Maloneys 2 line breaks to Pearces none. He ran for twice as many metres but only made one more run. 1 offload to Pearces none.
Add to the above the fact that Pearce made 2 very, very poor grabber kick choices in the first half
But hey, they are only stats in the end. Maloney looked far more involved and composed in the 1st 50. If we are fair dinkum too, he looked far more dangerous
Yes exactly like that. The 2 line breaks i mentioned, both assisted but full credit to him, he still made the breaks (cant remember if both were in the first 50 though?). I would always expect maloney to have more run metres as that is his strength and role.
The 2 grubber kicks we have gone through ad nauseum and i agree they were poor. That is the only aspect of his performance that warranted criticism. Maloney did have 1 grubber of his own that was very poor and was a massive danger of resulting in a long range play but no one seems to want to mention that.
Not sure how you can possibly conclude maloney was more involved im the first 50. Everyone is applauding (rightly) peats for his performance, particularly his tracker stats but the only man on the field who covered more distance in the first half was Pearce, his enthusiasm in the kick chase during the first half arm wrestle being a prime example.
That just leaves "he looked more dangerous". I don't think either looked dangerous in what was a first half arm wrestle to be honest.