jimmy_the_greek
Bench
- Messages
- 3,325
i cant really say, he diserved more or less, thats for the judiciary to decide, when i saw it, it looked pritty bad although at the end of the day it was the juidicary decides..
Earl said:Absolutley ridicolous.
Michael Crockers tackle was worse?
East Coast Tiger said:If he really wanted to hurt Corey Hughes he could have gone in with a swinging arm, something I believe is viewed as less serious in our game than kneeing, but in this instance would not have been any less dangerous.
The point I'm making is these incidents get blown way out of proportion and calls for massive suspensions is over the top and detrimental to the game.
Danish said:I dont know of too many ways of getting causing a serious spinal injury by copping a bit of a knee to the guts....
Of course spear tackles are worse. They are the worst part of the game.
A knee is just a cat act. It doesnt actually have much chance of causing any sort of injury, particularly when its a soft knee to the guts. Most tackles would have hurt twice as much as that.
7 weeks is fair. IMO the absolute only offences that should ever see a suspension in the double figures are intentional high shots, king hits, and spears. All have far greater chance of causing injury than a knee (unless you attack their head of course).
Timmah said:What happens if next time Morley has a brain snap, connects with the head of the player and has enough force to fracture a skull? There was intent to cause injury, whether he connected with the intended part is irrelevant. Just because he's a good player, he doesn't deserve special treatment. It's far too convenient that he's back in time for tri-nations. 12 weeks minimum. Extremely soft sentence.
Lyzor, once again you've proven your worth. Try offering an argument behind your paltry statement instead of just saying it "was disgustingly harsh".
marshall stalin said:the sentence was a joke and is another reason why the game is losing support as the players may as well wear dresses and play in makeup.
It will be like the afl soon were players are charged for dancing with an opponent (which the afl strangely calls a melee) although it looks like they are auditioning to be a contestant for dancing with the stars.
the people on here who think it was right or he should have got more need to have a good look at themselves as maybe you should be wearing dresses and make up yourselves.- most likley do
the world has become so soft nowadays and needs to return to great days of the 1940's/50's and early 1960's. Military service including active service needs to be re-introduced to toughen up the soft generations
Pierced Soul said:If morely hadnt been finishing his NRL career would he have gotten more?
Hutty1986 said:So I'm guessing you thought compulsory conscription was a great idea too?
How about WWI? Or WWII?
Need a few more of those hey champ, so we can "toughen up" this generation
Chook said:The NRL will be softer as a result of the loss of Moz.
He is the last true hard man of the game.
Played with sprains, strains, tears, concussion and agression.
There are no more hard men in our game, no current player stacks up to Moz.
Farewell champ, you will be missed by those who loved the toughness you brought to our game.
Chook.
HoLLuS said:Whinge whinge whinge whinge whinge whinge *breath* whinge whinge whinge.
The guy has finished his NRL career, he will not 'hurt' your teams anymore, wtf do you care if he got longer??
I don't remember seeing Lolesi suspended for a shoulder charge to the head, or Menzies for a similiar incident, yet Morley should have been ousted for 6-8 weeks according to some of you morons.
I am aghast at the level of knowledge or lack there of displayed on these forums about rugby league.
You all have such short memories to go with your very small brains.