winnyason said:warnabal f**k off, you waste of space, tell your mum the fat f**king s**t to stop calling me, me & my mates are sick of the spit roasting.
like throwing a sausage in a hallway, like a bowl of custard.
had to roll her in flour to find the wet spot.
ParraEelsNRL said:Would someone ban this clown?
Woods99 said:Errr, what about us rah rahs who attended government schools, do we count?
I think most Australians actually enjoy good international sport. Last time I checked, the Wallabies were the most recognisable sporting brand in the country. As for the losses, well, as Wayne Bennett said, that goes with the territory of a competitive environment. Do you really prefer to see the Kangaroos win year after year after year after......well, you get the drift.
Taipan, all is never lost when there are still some dreamers around to dream their dreams.![]()
Loser said:woods99 is cool, what has he done to upset anyone?
taipan said:What about the rahs rahs who attended govt schools? so what I was talking about my experience at a private school and the dumb statements I got there which you have duplicated.Having attended a state school also up to year 7,i have a fair recollection of attitudes.
The Kangaroos if I remember correctly ,lost against the Kiwis at Telstra stadium in rd 1 of the tri nations .
One thing about the Kangaroos they are a consistently skilled and winning rugby team in a competitive environment,it is a pity the same cant be said for your Walls.
Maybe you should check again because the Socceroos may have just usurped the Wallabies as the most recognised sporting brand and they will play in a real world cup,not in a cup where the same 8 teams each year have only a realistic chance(a quote yesterday by a union official).
Yeah mate the same dreamers who have started up the game in Netherlands and Germany and Serbia.
Whilst there are dreamers from another code who spend half their valuable productive life,making ignorant comments about rugby league on this forum,to confirm the perception many have of some of that code's followers.:^o
Woods99 said:Taipan,
1. I spend about 20 minutes a day here. Not every day, incidentally.
2. The "Socceroos" are having their moment in the sun. I will wait for the next Sweeney Report to see how they are doing in terms of recognition. Remember they played in the 1974 World Cup too, with little or no impact on the popularity of the game.
3. Only seven nations have won the Soccer World Cup, so if there are 8 who can win the Rugby version that is not too shabby, is it? (Uruguay, Italy, Germany, Brazil, England, Argentina and France have all won the Soccer World Cup. Of these countries, England, Argentina and France have all beaten the Wallabies, Italy toured here this year, and Uruguay and Germany have domestic rugby union competitions. Just for interest)
4. The Kangaroos play three or four times a year, on average, against the same two teams. That is a competitive environment?
5. Germany? Not much progress according to Der Kaiser. Holland? Not much progress according to Yanto. Maybe you know better.
6. Finally, I have played both games, and have a fair grasp of the history of both. Rugby union was a minor sport in Australia when I first started playing and following it. It has grown enormously in both player numbers and support over the years. That is not a dream, sunshine.
Big Bunny said:I quite like the idea of including the Canadians in the mix. The more I think about it, the more I'm becoming fond of regional leagues that are defined by natural geography rather than man made borders. A good example of that is Der Kaiser's Alpine League that will include both German and Austrian clubs, it just makes a lot of sense. It's a shame that the old Tri-Counties league never kicked on between the 2 Canadian clubs and the New Yorkers.
Woods99 said:GBT2,
Yeah, Japan is a "figment of the imagination" with over 4000 clubs and 125000 registered players.
There is certainly something legitimate about all genuine domestic sporting competitions, but I wonder about the value of dreaming.
screeny said:Tee hee hee....do you really, really, honestly, really believe that there are FOUR THOUSAND RU clubs in Japan? I mean, really?
It's a big place and all that, but 4000....?
good god!! That's a lot of bench players.... how do they fit them all in?Hugo Tantamount-Stirrup said:There are (according to the IRB website) 9 clubs in Canada and 54,509 registered players. So it must be true.
Copa said:good god!! That's a lot of bench players.... how do they fit them all in?
Hugo Tantamount-Stirrup said:There are (according to the IRB website) 9 clubs in Canada and 54,509 registered players. So it must be true.
Woods99 said:And according to the Rugby Canada website (www.rugbycanada.ca) there are 135 rugby union clubs.
I would find this easier to believe than to believe that rugby league exists, for example, in Singapore.
Hugo Tantamount-Stirrup said:But like many kick 'n' clappers you fail to give us the complete picture.
So there are 135 clubs from that source, as opposed to the IRB's (who you conveniently used previously) which gives a figure of nine clubs. The real figure is probably 'registered players', which knowing how RU uses it's infamous calculator can mean anything.
So, who of the two is being economical with the truth?
So... what's your AMNRL vision woody?Woods99 said:Go look for yourself, penis-head. If you try hard, you should be able to work it out.