baselinepanther
Bench
- Messages
- 3,224
hahahaGonna be honest this is a pretty moronic take. Sure you can't prove it's right or wrong which is exactly why you can't claim it as proof for your argument. It's the whole causation vs correlation situation. Is it possible that the 6 again rule has helped the popularity of the game? I mean sure it's possible but there is absolutely no proof for it and making that game in defense of the rule makes no sense.
Personally I think it's much more likely that Kayo is the real reason for our ratings going up. NRL fans finally have an option besides ch9 that doesn't involve paying a second mortgage for fox
This isn't really true IMO. Sports like golf don't really have this issue and plenty of other sports that do it's a minor issue at most (like tennis or soccer). With NRL the officiating is a constant looming force over the game and has a huge impact on the flow of every game of league. Growing up playing league and union you got to know the refs and how they impacted the game and it absolutely changed how you had to play. I absolutely did not find this the case in any other sport I played.
Now I agree there are other sports where this is a HUGE issue especially with like basketball for example but it's far from a universal problem with sport.
speaking of moronic ... They had kayo 3 years ago too & big uptake & the ratings weren't as big or anywhere near as big so they're not existing viewers , they're new. And it
wouldn't matter if they had kayo or anything else for that matter if the product wasn't worth watching They wouldn't watch ... Its better IMO because of the wrestle being lessened as a result of the fatigue due to the set restart rule. Anyone saying its anything else is stating their opinion as well. But their reasons ( like yours ) are no more convincing.
Golf ?
Tennis ??
You're an idiot & that is the proof
Last edited: