What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Signings- Take 2

Frederick

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
27,658
Well he has never been a noted runner of the ball. The Knights shouldn't have bought him if they wanted that type of a half. He is more an organiser than a runner.

I'd still give a him a shot with us where he inst expected to carry the entire team.

Bulldogs put wanted Mbye / Reynolds halves pairing. Knights realised they bought the wrong type of half.
No he was exactly the type of half we needed as Mullen was going to be our runner. But then Mullen decided to go f**k everyone over which left Hodkinson to run the team himself and, as stated, he did so poorly that he was dropped for a rookie
 

MilkShark

First Grade
Messages
5,162
No he was exactly the type of half we needed as Mullen was going to be our runner. But then Mullen decided to go f**k everyone over which left Hodkinson to run the team himself and, as stated, he did so poorly that he was dropped for a rookie
Well there you go. Pretty harsh considering (not meaning to be rude here) he had less than a reserve grade team around him.

I honestly think playing with a team worthy of being in the NRL he will do much better.

Time will tell.
 

Frederick

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
27,658
Well there you go. Pretty harsh considering (not meaning to be rude here) he had less than a reserve grade team around him.

I honestly think playing with a team worthy of being in the NRL he will do much better.

Time will tell.

We shall see, but as someone who watched absolute bludgers outperform him week in, week out for the last couple of years, I'm telling you you're going to be in trouble if he's your starting halfback.
 
Messages
10,922
135k for an Soo winning half, that is a positive no doubt, 1 year as well won't hurt cap going forward, and we still have plenty to spend
 

shaggs

Coach
Messages
11,181
Well he has never been a noted runner of the ball. The Knights shouldn't have bought him if they wanted that type of a half. He is more an organiser than a runner.

I'd still give a him a shot with us where he isn't expected to carry the entire team.

Bulldogs put wanted Mbye / Reynolds halves pairing. Knights realised they bought the wrong type of half.
That didn’t work out so well for the dogs.
Both of those guys won’t be in the halves next year.
Should have kept hodkinson and Reynolds and put Mbue at the back
 

King Ben

Juniors
Messages
1,184
The ultimate irony is that if we didn't get Maloney for 2016 we would've ended up with Chad and Hodkinson.
 

Frederick

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
27,658
Ok

Lucky my club didn’t sign him then.
Sign him or not, they wanted to and wanted to badly. So that makes us both fans to teams that condone beastiality

So you're gonna have to come up with something else to try and troll
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
Sign him or not, they wanted to and wanted to badly. So that makes us both fans to teams that condone beastiality

So you're gonna have to come up with something else to try and troll
Troll?
Says the bloke in here bagging out a player that his club has just let go and might come here.

Do you know what irony is?
 

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
Hokko will be wonderful for your club...but probably not on the field. He’s a really nice bloke so hopefully he can prove us all wrong but he’s on one leg and has tendency to shaft responsibility to rookies. Sharks have a lot of experience though so there will be a lot of blokes to pick up the slack.
 

chewsta

First Grade
Messages
6,943
I dont think we will see much of Hoko in firsts at all to be honest. And i wont be dissappointed about it.
Chad is a much better half.
 
Top