You're using participation rates for soccer as the crux of your argument?
Kids play soccer because it's far safer than rugby league and rugby union. They're scared of getting tackled by a bigger kid.
The kids who play rugby union and rugby league have a completely different mentality than the ones who play soccer. They're not afraid of getting tackled and enjoy the contact.
Foce were getting over 25k to their games at Subiaco in the late 00s.
No Im showing there are many metrics to measuring popualarity of a sport. Grassroots participation rates are not necessarily reflective of top tier professional sports following.
If it was soccer, basketball and netball would have by far the biggest and wealthiest professional comps in the country!
Thats only part of the reason, its also suited to all body types and abilities, is easier to play if theres just a few of you, can be easily played in the school yard and is the biggest professional sport in the world with global superstars.
Occasionally, which again is why its nonsense to suggest the Force of today has any relevance what so ever to how an NRL club will go, or that no-one in Perth follows other sports other than AFL, which may also have been one of your BS claims in the past?