What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NFT - The History of Crime Punishment

Andy

First Grade
Messages
5,048
In the grand sweep of history, people who go to prison as punishment for a crime, pretty much beat the rap. Old-time justice beat the snot out of you, or chopped off the head containing the snot.

With that in mind, here are five excellent reasons why Martha Stewart might welcome the chance to redecorate a minimum security prison--given the historic alternatives.

1. Flogging

Modern prisons, built for reform and buggery, didn't come to be until the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Prior to that, convicts got beat, banished, or butchered, not warehoused. Small-time crooks, more often than not, were stripped and flogged. In fact, Delaware, a state known for its corporate-friendly law, flogged some poor sap as recently as 1952. Other cultures still don't spare the rod. Singapore, for example, caned an American teenager for vandalism in 1994, though it did reduce the sentence from six butt-blistering strokes to four.

2. Hanging

Troublemakers not acquitted or flogged generally swung at the end of a rope. And, historically, they did swing. The "modern" method of hanging imagined by most Americans--where the noose quickly snaps the condemned person's neck--is newfangled. Most of the time, a hanging death meant slow strangulation. Even now, many countries take their convicts to the gallows. In the United States, hanging is legal in Washington and Delaware (though Delaware dismantled its gallows last year), and condemned necks have snapped as recently as 1996.

3. Drawing and Quartering

Filtch a purse, get flogged. Beat a neighbor, get hanged. But commit treason against the English king, and you are really in trouble. First, you were dragged to the place of your doom. Then, you were hanged--but not until death. No, hanging was the pregame warm-up. Next, your intestines were removed from your gut and burned before your eyes. Then, and only then, were you beheaded. To add insult to injury, your body was cut into four pieces and denied a Christian burial. Scotland's William Wallace was one of the first to suffer this gruesome fate in 1305. The last came in 1820.

4. Beheading

Having your head whacked off with an axe or sword doesn't sound particularly nice, but it was the punishment that aristocrats traditionally reserved for themselves. The ancient Greeks and Romans reserved beheading for citizens, and only a high-ranking Englishman ever lived to see his head parted from his neck. Whipping and hanging were for slaves and plebes, while fines (called delicts in Rome) and beheading were upper-crust punishments--until the French Revolution, that is. Tired of seeing nobles have all the fun, the revolutionaries introduced the guillotine in 1792 as a way to bring beheading to everyone, regardless of social class. The last head rolled in 1977.

5. Crucifixion

If beheading was generally reserved for grand high muck-a-mucks, crucifixion was for those literally in the muck: slaves, pirates, rebels, the despised--anyone with few rights and less standing. The Romans, of course, made crucifixion famous, but the ancient Persians probably dreamed it up. Death could take hours or even days, and generally came from shock, heart failure, or suffocation, as the victim gradually lost the strength to support his body's weight and found it harder and harder to breathe. Impatient Romans sometimes hastened the process by shattering the victim's legs with an iron club.


Michael Himick
March 8, 2004
 

Andy

First Grade
Messages
5,048
Nope, just thought there would be some people in here who, like me, would find this sort of information interesting.

If not, you're still being educated by reading it... Not like your thread ;-)
 

Kaz

junior
Messages
6,376
Thanks for sharing this info.

It was an eye-opener.

As my smilie shows.

sarcastic-neckgrab.gif
 

Doctor

Bench
Messages
3,612
_____________________________________________________________
Some notes on the work of Louis Kervran

By: Adam McLean


In an article in La Revue Generale des Sciences Paris, of July 1960, Louis Kervran, then Director of Conferences at the University of Paris, described experiments proving the existence of the transmutation of some elements by biological means. Further details were given by him in a book Transmutation Biologiques (Maloine, Paris 1962). These experiments involved measuring the weight of Potassium and Calcium in dry seeds and in germinated seeds, these seeds during germination being isolated from contact with Potassium or Calcium in their environment, say through the water or air. Thus any measured increase in the weight of these elements could only be explained by some transmutation occuring in the living plant.
These publications were received with scepticism by some physicists because such transmutations were not explainable within the laws of physics then admitted. However, other scientists were to confirm Kervran's findings. Among these were Prof. Dr. Hisatoki Komaki, chief of the Laboratory of Applied Microbiology at a Japanese University, Prof. Baranger, Head of the Laboratory of Chemical Biology in the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris. J.E. Zundel, at that time Director of a paper company having a chemical analysis laboratory, pointed out that in germinating oats, there was an increase of Calcium of sometimes more that 100% in a medium containing no calcium. Prom where was this Calcium derived ? Kervran suggested from Potassium, because of a decrease of Potassium (K) quantitatively equal to the increase in Calcium (Ca), and he gave the following formula in 1960

After many experiments, hundreds of analyses of tens of thousands of grains or plants J.E. Zundel (then Chemical Engineer of the Polytechnicum School of Zurich) confirmed these findings in a lecture in 1971 at the French Academy of Agriculture (Bull No. 4, 1972). He had then used chemical and physical methods of analysis. Later in 1979, Zundel, using the mass spectrometer at C.N.R.S (the Microanalysis Laboratory of the French National Scientific Research Centre), and neutron activation mass analysis at the Swiss Institute for Nuclear Research in Villigen (Aargau), confirmed the increase for Calcium of 61% + or - 2% (average for both laboratories) that is absolutely beyond any statistical dispersion. (There was also an increase of 291% for Phosphorus and 36% for Sulphur). See the article - 'Transmutation of the Elements in Oats' in The Planetary Association for Clean Energy Newsletter, Volume 2, Number 3, July/August 1980. So it now seems that transmutations of a few elements arise as a property of the metabolism of living matter, transmutations obtained in great quantity at a low energy.
Recently a possible explanation for this phenomenon within the framework of modern physics has been evolved by French physicist Oliver Costa de Beauregard, Professor of Theoretical Physics at the Institut de Physique Theorique Henri Poincare (Faculty of Sciences, Paris) who is also Director of the Centre National de la Reserche Scientifique (C.N.R.S.). Costa de Beauregard suggests that such transmutations neither takes place through strong interactions, nor through electromagnetic forces, but through the weak interaction. This takes place through the neutral current of the intermediate vector boson, the so called Zo, particle recently discovered by particle physicists. Kervran's reaction for a biological transmutation from Potassium (K) to Calcium (Ca) in germinating oats is thus explained as being Initiated by neutrino capture (from cosmic rays) and the weak interaction follows mediated by the Z, neutral current (the Zo probably existing as a virtual particle):-

It would seem that this formula has brought the reality of these transmutations into the theoretical framework of modern physics. We thus see that in living matter there not only occurs the chemical reactions (electromagnetic forces) of photosynthesis involving the absorption of photons of light from the sun, but also weak interactions that can effect the nuclear structure of matter, activated through the participation of cosmic energy in the form of neutrinos that stream down upon the earth from the depths of the universe. A full awareness of the consequences of these ideas should have a profound influence upon many domains of modern science, not least in agriculture, dietetics and healing.

In my article on 'The Ethers and the Fundamental Forces of Physics' in the Hermetic Journal Number 9, I pointed out that the weak interaction bore a relationship to the transforming ether known in esotericism. Indeed, I there related that this transforming ether "promotes the multiplicity of forms within the material realm through its transmutative quality of etheric force". Thus with Louis Kervran's profoundly important work we could stand upon the threshold of a turning point in the physical sciences, and we seem to have the meeting ground between contemporary Physics and an esoteric science of the ethers. One can only hope that such research is fully followed up and the profound implications for the present rigid view of the mechanism of living matter are not missed. Indeed can it be that the transmutations of the ancient alchemists may again gain scientific respectability?

In preparing this short article, I have drawn from published material from various sources, but for the basis of the article I am indebted to Louis Kervran's own translation of a recently published article on his work.


http://www.levity.com/alchemy/kervran.html
_____________________________________________________________

Feeling knowledgable now? ;-)
 

Andy

First Grade
Messages
5,048
Very.

But I wasn't at all interested by Loius Kervran's germination experiments or his colleague's scientific findings either.

But I read the entire piece just to humour you. :D
 

Doctor

Bench
Messages
3,612
Andy said:
Very.

But I wasn't at all interested by Loius Kervran's germination experiments or his colleague's scientific findings either.

But I read the entire piece just to humour you. :D

As did I for your crime and punishment piece.
But the difference is that I didn't bother reading the Kervran piece - I gave up after the first paragraph. :sleeper:

Perhaps there is room for a regular NFT of the week - a knowledge thread designed to broaden the minds of forummers.

Maybe it's time for the Brain explosion of the week return :!:
 

Kaz

junior
Messages
6,376
Oswin said:
As did I for your crime and punishment piece.
But the difference is that I didn't bother reading the Kervran piece - I gave up after the first paragraph. :sleeper:

That is much more than I read for both posts. :lol: :p
 

Latest posts

Top