What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL RULES SHAKE UP TO CHANGE THE GAME

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
34,095
The Grapple tackle gone!!!! so does the Roosters favourite the Standing flop is gone.
I'll bet the Roosters are upset about that!!!!

What do you guys think
 
Messages
15,516
Yes Goose will be livid! They spent many hundered hours practicing ways of cheating in tackles and now it has been exploited to the point that the NRL have had to step in.

Keep an eye on an article to come from bee sting head in the Sun Herald in coming weeks to say why it is wrong to ban a "tackling skill"........... :lol:
 

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
34,095
Dragon Slayer said:
Yes Goose will be livid! They spent many hundered hours practicing ways of cheating in tackles and now it has been exploited to the point that the NRL have had to step in.

Keep an eye on an article to come from bee sting head in the Sun Herald in coming weeks to say why it is wrong to ban a "tackling skill"........... :lol:

My thoughts exactly the Rooster 2 years ago went to the NRL and changed the rules to suit them. That year they won the competition by default.
 

Cometshark

Juniors
Messages
194
Im not a fan of you know who, but if these rules were in last year his style of play would of had a chance at working, not saying it would but it would have been easier.
 

Macca

Coach
Messages
18,399
That's very true Comet. However, he is gone and although I was a huge supporter of him, I am over it.
 

shadowboxer

First Grade
Messages
6,914
just as we imagined.

Stuart blasts new rule
By Peter Frilingos
March 4, 2004

ROOSTERS coach Ricky Stuart has accused the NRL of paranoia over the introduction of measures to ensure gang tackles don't slow down the play-the-ball this season.

Stuart says the rule amendment is directly aimed at curbing his club's defensive style.

The NRL has instructed referees to crack down on tacklers "dancing" with ball carriers by holding them up while waiting for another tackler to put him to ground.

NRL referees boss Robert Finch says the ploy is a standing "flop" designed to delay the play-the-ball.

Two years ago Stuart's up-and-in defence featuring fierce gang-tackling helped take the Roosters all the way to grand final victory over the New Zealand Warriors and runner-up status last year.

While many clubs followed Stuart's defensive lead last season there have been detractors keen to bring the Roosters back to the field.

At least that's what Stuart believes has happened.

"The game is too fast these days for the defence to try and hold attacking players up waiting for another tackler to arrive to complete the tackle," Stuart said.

"Even in the old rules that sort of thing was deemed to be a flop tackle.

"I think the NRL is going overboard regarding the holding-up rule.

"This move is a direct result of the Roosters' success in defence over the past couple of years.

"We are now becoming too paranoid in the game about such issues.

"We're in a position where we're trying to take grey areas out of the game for referees when it's unnecessary."

The coach said his team would be unaffected by the amendment to the rules and he would not be changing its defensive style.

"We will continue to play by the rules," Stuart said. "When the attacker is still moving you're allowed seven players in to the tackle if you like."

Stuart indicated that if that many tacklers arrived at the same time there was no way his side could be penalised for allegedly slowing down the play-the-ball.

The shortening of the 10-metre rule to an average of eight metres has also been a contributing factor leading to slower play-the-balls.

Defensive players have that split-second more to get into the faces of attacking players in numbers and when they perform dominant tackles they are allowed more time to get off tackled players.

NRL referees boss Robert Finch gave an assurance this week that despite the crackdown on "dancing" tackles, dominant tacklers would continue to be rewarded with extra time to get off grounded opponents.

Ever since Stuart's players set new standards in defence the ruck area has been under intense scrutiny by rival coaches and the NRL.

In fact the old sliding defence has taken a back seat to the new wave.

That development is the latest stage of the push to get the game closer to its gladiatorial roots.

But having said that the NRL has obviously taken steps to ensure the game does not go back to the ultra-defensive style of the mid-1980s.
-------------------------------------------------------------
There is an old yard comment being either "suffer in your jocks" or
"eat sh#t and die" - either way ricky, freddy and new recruit, harrigan - "jam it sideways"
 

cheese

Bench
Messages
4,013
How f**king ironic is this? LARF.....whatta f**king joker..... How does your own medicine taste, dicky?! fargwit
 

Macca

Coach
Messages
18,399
Boo hoo. The rule suited you 2 years ago didn't it Ricky? Bloody Roosters expect the game to revolve around them. They are forgetting that there are 14 other clubs! Can't wait to see the game return to attacking footy. This can only suit Brett Kimmorley and the Sharks! WOOHOO! :D
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
It will be a nice refreshing change to see Ricky take the mantle as the NRL coach who cries the loudest....their all out to get us .
Take a seat Ando youv'e had your turn . :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Messages
15,203
NRL referees boss Robert Finch gave an assurance this week that despite the crackdown on "dancing" tackles, dominant tacklers would continue to be rewarded with extra time to get off grounded opponents.

Funny that he couldnt just go through with the rule change and say "that's the way it's going to be"

He had to give a nice little concession to his son's team that "seven players" as Stuart put it, will still be able to spend several minutes crawling around on the tackled player, slowing down the game and thus limiting the number of tries scored and therefore, the entertainment value of the sport.
 

carinashark

First Grade
Messages
5,584
Yes! Its all about the referees. With Bill on a retainer at Easts they will have the best chance of defeating any rules or making them work for them. Why didnt we think of bringing Bill on board? He even lives at Gymea ! Come on sharks lets start thinking outside the box.
Carinashark
 
Messages
4,792
Swings and round abouts eh, Sticky? In 2001, he had the rules modified to suit his gang tackling defence against the Sharks.

The game moves on Stuart, you'll just have to show everyone if you can adpat yor coaching to changes in the game.
 

PJ

First Grade
Messages
6,068
What's Ricky whingeing about.

They've told him they are changing the rules and are doing so at the start of the season.

He didn't have any complaints when they changed them running into the semifinals the year before last and only told the Roosters.

Hey Ricky, why don't you and your cheating club tack this complaint onto your legal action against the salary cap.

Tool
 

shadowboxer

First Grade
Messages
6,914
Why didnt the sharks bring harrigan on board?

Probally the idea never popped into there heads, who would be that tragic to hire a top ex ref to throw around the rule book and try and milk the fine art of penalty pulling. Ah, thats right. I forgot. I reckon this might be interesting ;-)
 
Messages
15,203
Why didnt the sharks bring harrigan on board?

Probally the idea never popped into there heads, who would be that tragic to hire a top ex ref to throw around the rule book and try and milk the fine art of penalty pulling.
Exactly

Who would think of hiring a ref to try and push the rules to the limit?? The rest of us honest clubs just get on with playing according to the laws of the game!
 

Latest posts

Top