Best front rower in the world? It is a big call when he hasn't been tested in the NRL.
The young players mentioned are not just average players.
Always the dilemma, buy big or save your dollars for the outcome of junior development.
Why develop them if you lose them? Why in Woods' case earmark money from your top NRL cap for three or more years to retain him and then lose him? Doesn't make good business sense.
Not being tested in the NRL has been proved by Ellis and Burgess to be BS. Graham is a quality player and will have the same type of impact if he decides to come to the NRL.
In an ideal world I would want to keep all our juniors and sign the top players but we all know we can't keep everyone.
I agree to some extant with you. I would rather keep and develop our juniors than go out and buy your average first grader. But when one of the best players in their position is available, particularly a prop, you would be crazy not to go for them.
If it came down to it why would you keep Woods and the Shirnacks in the hope that they might become as good as Graham is when you can just get Graham now.
His contract was breeched by WT so he can walk away any time he chooses
If Souths have proven anything it is that a great pack of forwards can make a useless halves combination seem like a great one. Imagine what they could do with Marshall and Farah and whoever they want to throw in the 7
What happened to club spirit? We have some of the most promising young forwards coming through the lower grades and many want to "throw" this Graham into the side at horrendous cost?
I say stick with what we have coming through the grades. Loyalty works both ways and with Galloway, Payton, Gibbs and Ellis the Tigers have experience from which the younger players can learn.
You talk about loyalty and then mention 3 players we have signed from other clubs. If we took this attitude a few years ago we would still have Ben Galea and Halatau instead of Ellis. I know which one I would prefer
The two players I have mentioned would not attract no where near the salary of Graham. If it had been players such as Burgess or Shillington you may have a point.
It is a mute point about Graham anyway as it is doubtful he could be afforded. Yet, the club spends a lot of money developing and retaining juniors and you want to throw this all away? It cuts across the strength of the club which is the juniors. It sends the wrong message to our juniors.