bartman
Immortal
- Messages
- 41,022
From today's SMH:
Asked if he needed last night's win to make him complete as a coach, John Lang replied: "I don't need it personally. I remember [Brisbane coach] Wayne Bennett saying once that winning premierships wasn't the main point of coaching, that giving your team every chance to win was the main thing. And he was still saying that after he won five premierships.
"If we had played like we did tonight and still been beaten, would that have made us losers? I don't think so."
- - - -
This from two "successful" coaches! I want another premiership for Parra as much as anyone else, but the above comments suggest there are other elements to being a successful coach than just premierships, and that players must take some of the responsibility of their performances.
Does the Rooster's failure to win yesterday make Ricky Stuart a bad coach or a loser? Simple fact is they played crap, Penrith played better, and dominated some Roosters players who couldn't bring out their best form - Finch, Minicello, Byrne and Walker were horrible. I would say it had little to do with their coach(es).
That's not to say I don't think the Eels team/coaching needs a big turnaround in 2004 to give us "every chance to win", but if your team is consistently getting into the top 8/top 4 then you do have every chance and are not losers. Parra were losers in 2003 (and second half of 2002), and simply must recover from this moment forward.
Just thought this was an interesting comment from a "successful" coach.
Asked if he needed last night's win to make him complete as a coach, John Lang replied: "I don't need it personally. I remember [Brisbane coach] Wayne Bennett saying once that winning premierships wasn't the main point of coaching, that giving your team every chance to win was the main thing. And he was still saying that after he won five premierships.
"If we had played like we did tonight and still been beaten, would that have made us losers? I don't think so."
- - - -
This from two "successful" coaches! I want another premiership for Parra as much as anyone else, but the above comments suggest there are other elements to being a successful coach than just premierships, and that players must take some of the responsibility of their performances.
Does the Rooster's failure to win yesterday make Ricky Stuart a bad coach or a loser? Simple fact is they played crap, Penrith played better, and dominated some Roosters players who couldn't bring out their best form - Finch, Minicello, Byrne and Walker were horrible. I would say it had little to do with their coach(es).
That's not to say I don't think the Eels team/coaching needs a big turnaround in 2004 to give us "every chance to win", but if your team is consistently getting into the top 8/top 4 then you do have every chance and are not losers. Parra were losers in 2003 (and second half of 2002), and simply must recover from this moment forward.
Just thought this was an interesting comment from a "successful" coach.