What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Possible Rule changes

Messages
17,802
The following was published by the Sydney Morning Herald (source: https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/wi...-ones-they-should-change-20250823-p5mp73.html) -

Will the NRL trial new rules at the end of this season? These are the ones they should change​

Adrian Proszenko

By Adrian Proszenko

August 23, 2025 — 4.30pm

Rugby league is in something of a golden era and there is no need to significantly overhaul the rules. But given it is a product that is all about entertainment, there’s always the opportunity to make the “Greatest Game of All” even greater.

Innovations such as the captain’s challenge, which have helped eliminate terrible decisions by officials, have been trialled in the final rounds of NRL seasons.

With a series of games in round 27 that have no impact on the finals, it is the perfect platform to road test some new rules.
Here are our 10 proposed rule tweaks, which would create added interest in games of little consequence with a view to potentially being introduced into the NRL competition.

1. Let teams take full advantage if the opposition drops the ball​

If a no-ball is bowled in limited-overs cricket, the batsman gets a free hit the next ball. A similar rule should be applied to rugby league. When one team makes a mistake and the other team picks up the ball, the latter should have the entire tackle to take their advantage. That would encourage the team with the ball to throw it around, and perhaps even put in an attacking kick, knowing that if the enterprising play doesn’t come off, play will restart where the ball was originally dropped and they will have possession anyway. The “full advantage” rule would encourage more enterprising play when the game is in transition.

2. To stop diving, players who stay down for a penalty need to go off for a head-injury assessment​

The milking of penalties for high tackles has become a blight on the game. How often do you see a player lie motionless on the turf after minimal contact, only to spring to their feet as soon as a penalty is awarded? This is a simple way to stop it: if you stay down, you need to come off for a head-injury assessment. Whether it’s a full 15-minute SCAT-6 assessment or one that’s conducted by a trainer for tow to three minutes, players would be less inclined to dive if they are required to come from the field.

3. Reduce the amount of time trainers are on the field​

The fans pay their money to see the players, not the trainers. Currently, the blue-shirt trainer is allowed to run messages and water when their team has possession, until the fourth tackle, up to three times a half. Ridiculously complex. Unless the conditions are unseasonably hot – this is a winter sport – we propose that they must come off the field after the second tackle, and only twice a half can they go on. The orange trainer is allowed on the field to provide water when the side is in possession – but we propose this should only be permitted when they are in their own half. There are already enough provisions to provide water during stoppages.

4. Bring back the five-minute sin bin​

Reducing a team to 12 men for 10 minutes, for anything but instances of deliberate foul play, is too harsh. It is almost impossible to repel a team while a man down – although the Storm managed it on Friday night, but that’s why they are the premiership favourites – and we’ve seen too many games decided when referees march players for contact that is often accidental.

5. A send-off shouldn’t ruin a game​

If a player is sent off, he can take no further part in the game. But after 10 minutes, the player that has been sent off should be able to be replaced by another player. The offending team would need to use an interchange to make that happen, but the change would prevent games effectively being over as a contest due to one mistake by one player.

6. Time off in the final five minutes​

This idea comes courtesy of former Wests Tigers winger and SEN personality Joel Caine. There’s nothing worse than seeing the clock tick down in a close game, when the team ahead on the scoreboard is using every trick in the book to waste time. Currently, the clock only stops after points are scored and scrums are packed, but this should also apply to balls kicked into touch and all other stoppages.

7. No field goals after the 75th minute​

This innovation is another brainchild of Caine. Close games, whether they be in regulation or extra time, are often marred by a series of ugly field goal attempts. They are a nightmare to referee as defenders sprint off the line early, the kicking side uses blockers and the match unravels as a spectacle. Two-point field goals would still be permitted, however.

“If you did forensic science with five minutes to go or in golden point, every field goal is a mess, it makes it ugly,” Caine explained. “There will be a grand final won or lost on that.

“That means you don’t have to go into golden try. That solves that problem.”

8. In extra time, games aren’t decided until both teams have at least one possession​

This ensures that neither team is disadvantaged by the restart and adds another layer of intrigue. There’s a similar rule in the NFL, where each team must have a chance to possess the ball. The issue would be if a team scored with the first possession in extra time. Would they then have to kick off? Since we’re in the mood to change things up, and in the great rugby league tradition, we’d introduce another new rule in this instance to make the team that scored kick off.

9. Start the second period of extra time where the ball was last played​

This idea also comes from Caine. Overtime football is all about possession and field position, so there should be some reward if one team ends the first five-minute period with the better of those things.
“My solution is that the second half of golden point – when there is no field goal allowed – that instead of kicking off again and wasting three minutes for someone to get field position, you start the second half where play ended in the first half of golden point,” Caine said.

While the teams still swap ends to allow for wind and the condition of the field, if you finished the first period of extra time 20 metres out on the third tackle, that’s how play should restart in the second period.

10. Players can be tackled midair when contesting kicks​

The way the game is currently trending – due to the dominance of outstanding leapers such as Xavier Coates, Daniel Tupou and Zac Lomax – future wingers will need to be two metres tall to get a start in the NRL. Not being able to tackle players in the air is weighted too much in favour of the big leapers. A compromise is to allow the player coming down with the ball to be tackled in the air, as long as they are brought down safely. Failure to do so would result in a penalty or potentially a penalty try.
 
Messages
16,394
1. Not a fan, but worth a try
2. Should happen, I remember the HIA crackdown a few years back that everyone sooked about, could be another instance of this but it should stop the diving
3. Should happen
4. Worth a look I guess although seems like pointless nostalgia
5. No
6. No
7. No
8. No
9. No
10. Worth a look, crossfield bombs to giant wingers is well boring to watch

a couple of good ideas…but clearly had a mandate to pad this list to 10 because there are some shockers
 

snickers007

Juniors
Messages
1,794
They need to find a way to make a goal line drop out an advantage to the non-kicking team. At the moment, all the advantages go to the kicking team.

I propose that the non-kicking team is allowed to touch the ball before it has gone 10m, as long as they were behind the 10m line when the ball was kicked.

------------------------------------------

Additionally, time off after point scoring situations needs to be uniform across the full 80mins.

I don't care if it is time off after all points, or no time off after points.

But at the moment we have tries scored in the final 5mins of a half being worth more (4pts, a conversion and a stopped clock), while tries at other times are only worth 4pts and a conversion.

Last year when the Panthers scored 16 points in 3 minutes against the Eels was entertaining, but so unfair.

------------------------------------------

Finally, they need to rethink how the 6 again restarts impact the immediate play. Far too often, we see a set restart given, and the very next pass gets dropped. No advantage to the non offending team, they just rule knock on.

For 6 again restarts from 10m infringements, the non-offending team needs more advantage. For any errors on the immediate play, they need to retain possession. Whether that be a scrum, play the ball, or penalty given (probably too powerful, and open to exploitation).
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
18,263
Again a list like this in the media and no mention of ending charge downs recovered being a fresh set of 6. Its about the only rule change mentioned on here that gets 100% agreement and no media or official ever brings it up.

The ideas are otherwise pretty good 1,3,5,6,8,10 are good but yeah 7 is putrid possibly worst idea I've seen.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,098
My topball idea is this….

if a penalty or 6 again is awarded, the full 6 tackles shall be allowed to played even if time expires on the half. Teams deliberately holding down or just leaving early and being offside when defending in the final seconds is effectively unable to be punished at present, this would rectify that.

I’d also like to see timekeeping in general be much more professional. At the moment it’s a sloppy mess completely at the ref’s discretion. The 4th offical should be in charge of the clock, not the man in the middle. If the ref forgets to stop the clock at a certain point, time should be added back on to correct the error. Similarly shot clocks should never be allowed to be stopped by the ref like they are now, and we should also place a shot clock on kickers after which their attempt is automatically ruled as a miss.
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
2,118
I don’t mind your first idea Danish. Teams up by more than 2 points defending with a few seconds or 1 minute left are happy to lie on the tackler and waste a few extra seconds knowing the attacking team won't take the shot at goal and refs probably won't send anyone to the bin. Like rugby, you continue to play after the siren until there is a stoppage which in leagues case a play the ball would not count.
 

Munky

Coach
Messages
14,260
I'd like to see an eighteenth man added to the bench as 'contingent back'

The player has to have started the majority of their last ten games across the grades in the outside backs and evidenced to have played there. For example they can wear number five but video evidence shows them spending the game attacking and defending in the back row.

The player can only be subbed on for another outside back and that player cannot return. If a player is subbed off more than once in a five game period they can not play first grade the next week to stop exploitation by coaches.

My reasoning? Currently an early outside back injury (or any) can ruin the contest since carrying a back on the bench is a waste in 90% of games. The reshuffle often results in backrowers in the backline which can be a mismatch.

My club has been lucky that Luke Garner can actually play centre at a first grade level however it is super rare.
 

Jetka100

Juniors
Messages
266
My topball idea is this….

if a penalty or 6 again is awarded, the full 6 tackles shall be allowed to played even if time expires on the half. Teams deliberately holding down or just leaving early and being offside when defending in the final seconds is effectively unable to be punished at present, this would rectify that.

I’d also like to see timekeeping in general be much more professional. At the moment it’s a sloppy mess completely at the ref’s discretion. The 4th offical should be in charge of the clock, not the man in the middle. If the ref forgets to stop the clock at a certain point, time should be added back on to correct the error. Similarly shot clocks should never be allowed to be stopped by the ref like they are now, and we should also place a shot clock on kickers after which their attempt is automatically ruled as a miss.
I have suggested something similar before, but went a bit further and suggested that at the end of each half play would continue until there was a change in possession so the attacking team would get a full set of six and that would be extended if they got a penalty, received a 6 again or forced a goal line drop out. This would eliminate all the cynical plays and time wasting.
 

Mike Oxbigg

Juniors
Messages
259
I think that when successive six agains are called in quick succession, the original set of six is played out before the additional set begins. Too often we see teams give away a six again on the first tackle, then again the following tackle so the attacking side only gets a couple of extra tackles instead of twelve or eighteen.
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
2,118
I think that when successive six agains are called in quick succession, the original set of six is played out before the additional set begins. Too often we see teams give away a six again on the first tackle, then again the following tackle so the attacking side only gets a couple of extra tackles instead of twelve or eighteen.
I get where you are coming from and it's frustrating when the good teams are happy to give re-starts away to set their defensive line but I can see refs blowing successive 6 agains for a good team to give them 12 tackles against some poor bludger of a team down the bottom of the table but not the other way around. 6 agains are already open to soo much interpretation for refs to manipulate the game, don't want them then giving teams 12 tackles.
 
Messages
17,802
I think that when successive six agains are called in quick succession, the original set of six is played out before the additional set begins. Too often we see teams give away a six again on the first tackle, then again the following tackle so the attacking side only gets a couple of extra tackles instead of twelve or eighteen.

Only problem with that could be is what happens if you wind up with multiple six agains during one set (e.g. say you get 3), do you give 3 new sets of 6 in succession. Also, what happens if the team in possession commits an error (e.g. knock on) or foul play do they cancel out your proposed 6 agains? I like the principles involved, but it would be rather difficult to implement.
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
2,118
Only problem with that could be is what happens if you wind up with multiple six agains during one set (e.g. say you get 3), do you give 3 new sets of 6 in succession. Also, what happens if the team in possession commits an error (e.g. knock on) or foul play do they cancel out your proposed 6 agains? I like the principles involved, but it would be rather difficult to implement.
If there are 3 repeat 6 agains then you apply the sin bin if it's the Tigers. For any other team, who knows.
 

Chins

Bench
Messages
4,244
One small change I'd like to see is when a kick goes dead the opposition should be able to tap and run from anywhere. No need to go to the middle of the field and tap on the 20m.

My team is relatively slow so I'm not just calling for something that would benefit us.
 

yobbo84

Coach
Messages
13,836
If they're really about entertainment, the free play after an opposition error is the one to go with. Everything else it topball nonsense.
 

Valheru

Referee
Messages
20,705
The receiving team being able to touch the ball before it goes 10 on restarts is obvious. It is completely ridiculous that the ball can land on the try line and dribble 10m and not be touched by the receiving team.

Get rid of 7 tackle restarts, it's too harsh a punishment for kicks that are 1cm too long or near tries that are knocked on etc. Just have the tap take place from wherever it was kicked to a minimum of the 20m line.

Extend the bench to 8 players but leave the amount of interchanges the same. In a world of HIA we are losing too many players in games severely compromising teams. This allows teams to cover all positions on the bench but keeps fatigue in the game.

Get rid of full arm penalties for all of the below

- Double Movement
- Pass off the ground
- Obstruction
- Escort

A simple turnover would be enough punishment for all of these. None should be able to lead to the opposition scoring 2 points (theoretical in case of double movement) or turning field position.
 

Chins

Bench
Messages
4,244
The receiving team being able to touch the ball before it goes 10 on restarts is obvious. It is completely ridiculous that the ball can land on the try line and dribble 10m and not be touched by the receiving team.

Get rid of 7 tackle restarts, it's too harsh a punishment for kicks that are 1cm too long or near tries that are knocked on etc. Just have the tap take place from wherever it was kicked to a minimum of the 20m line.

Extend the bench to 8 players but leave the amount of interchanges the same. In a world of HIA we are losing too many players in games severely compromising teams. This allows teams to cover all positions on the bench but keeps fatigue in the game.

Get rid of full arm penalties for all of the below

- Double Movement
- Pass off the ground
- Obstruction
- Escort

A simple turnover would be enough punishment for all of these. None should be able to lead to the opposition scoring 2 points (theoretical in case of double movement) or turning field position.
Its taken 20k posts but this one is pretty good.

But if you're dumb enough to reach out for a double movement then you deserve the punishment.
 

Latest posts

Top