it's not just TPA's
players will take massive unders to go to the top clubs like storm & roosters and play under the best coaches + be surrounded by rep players
Maybe they don't become star quality but just show how good a solid first grader can look with a strong team around him.
Are good players better because of what they know? I suppose they must in at least some cases.
Not all good players are experienced. Look at the Broncos.If they weren't, what good is experience?
Not all good players are experienced. Look at the Broncos.
It could also be improved instinctual reactions (such as anticipation) on the field. I wouldn't think these could be taught to less experienced players.
That's not entirely true. Some things can only be learned by experience, through repetition.If "instinct" is improved through experience, then it is learned. If it is learned, it can be taught.
Well I didn't say instinct, I said instinctual, by which I mean that it becomes so ingrained that it resembles instinct. Obviously I don't mean it is knowledge the player is born with because I made clear the player had to learn it through experience.That doesn't mean it can be learned or taught to just any merkin though.
And yeah, I understand that it's a bit of a juxtaposition in terminology to use instinct and learned in that way, hence the inverted commas around instinct. because in the terms of how you use it here, it is a learned behaviour, and not really instinct at all.
That's not entirely true. Some things can only be learned by experience, through repetition.
The 10 thousand hours rule is an oversimplification but the idea holds.
Well I didn't say instinct, I said instinctual, by which I mean that it becomes so ingrained that it resembles instinct. Obviously I don't mean it is knowledge the player is born with because I made clear the player had to learn it through experience.
Then it's not very helpful teaching for a practical skill. Blokes would learn this stuff with repeated exposure whether they had some helpful merkin 'teaching' them or not. But if they only had a teacher and no practice they would learn nothing. That's the difference.It doesn't matter how it's learned, the fact that it can be learned means it can be taught.
If the teaching is simply "do it again", then that is what it is.
It's theory vs practice. Two different realms.You can also learn stuff by your own experience. You non't necessarily need to be taught it. Not by someone else anyway.
Yeah it is. Some people learn differently to others. You can try and teach some people something and they will never get it until through their own experience, the penny finally drops. Others pick things up immediately after having something explained to them. Depends on how your brain is wired I spose.It's theory vs practice. Two different realms.
That's why they practice in-game situations at training. I dare say experience at training is worth about as much as experience during a game. Maybe less, but at training you get the benefit of being able to recreate any situation you want. In-game events happen organically, except when the corrupt NRL are staging a massive conspiracy to rig games just to f**k us over. All this despite them being obviously incompetent.Wouldn't it help though if someone pointed out the things they should practice?
You can also learn stuff by your own experience. You non't necessarily need to be taught it. Not by someone else anyway.